Translate

08. 05. 2015.

NEWS RELEASE: Nauru: UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture urges island to set up detentio



UN torture prevention body urges Nauru to set up detention monitoring mechanism

GENEVA (6 May 2015) - The UN Subcommittee on the Prevention of Torture (SPT) has ended its first visit to Nauru, which focussed on the situation of people being detained on the island and the need to establish an independent monitoring body for places of detention.

During their three-day visit, the SPT delegation visited Nauru's police station and prison, as well as the Regional Processing Center (RPC) for asylum-seekers, a large facility comprising three separate units housing men, women and families with children who have been attempting to reach Australia.

"We were pleased to be able to visit all places of deprivation of liberty on the island," said Malcolm Evans, the chair of the SPT and head of the three-member delegation.

The SPT monitors how States that have ratified the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture (OPCAT) are meeting their treaty obligations, which include setting up a monitoring body known as a National Preventive Mechanism (NPM). Nauru became a party to OPCAT in January 2013 and an NPM should have been in place one year after that.

"Given the number of people currently being held on the island, the establishment of an NPM to address their needs and their situation becomes even more pressing," said Professor Evans. 
Against this background, Prof. Evans indicated that the SPT delegation was encouraged to receive the Government's assurances that this mechanism would be established as soon as possible.

"The SPT would be pleased to respond to any request by the Government of the Republic of Nauru for assistance.  It is, of course, essential that this mechanism is able to operate effectively and independently in all facilities on the island," Prof. Evans stressed.
The SPT delegation was composed of: Malcolm Evans, June Lopez and Nora Sveaass.

ENDS
For media inquiries, please contact Liz Throssell, +41 (0) 22 917 9466/ ethrossell@ohchr.org

BACKGROUND
The mandate of the SPT is to prevent torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment of persons deprived of their liberty through visiting, monitoring and advising all States that are parties to the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture (OPCAT).

States are obliged to allow the SPT unannounced and unhindered access to all places where people are or may be deprived of their liberty. States parties also have to establish a National Preventive Mechanism, which is expected to carry out regular monitoring visits of places of deprivation of liberty in all parts of the country.


OHCHR PRESS BRIEFING NOTE - (1) Yemen (2) Serbia (3) Honduras (4) New albinism micro-site on


5 May 2015


Spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights: Ravina Shamdasani
Location:        Geneva
Subjects:        (1) Yemen
                      (2) Serbia
                     (3) Honduras
                     (4) Albinism website launch

(1) Yemen

The conflict in Yemen has now taken at least 646 civilian lives, including 50 women and 131 children. In addition, more than 1,364 civilians have been injured. These are the figures from 26 March up to 3 May. There has also been severe destruction of civilian infrastructure, including houses, in many districts.

In recent days, we have documented the destruction of a number of civilian houses, reportedly belonging to individuals affiliated with the Houthis, by airstrikes. In one incident, on 1 May, at least 17 civilians were killed, including four children and nine women, and 27 civilians were injured as a result of an airstrike that allegedly targeted the home of a Houthi leader in the Sa’wan area of Sana’a City. Residents reported that they had believed their homes were safe as there were no military locations nearby.

In Aden, at least 22 civilians were killed in two separate incidents in the past week. And we are particularly concerned about airstrikes which hit a military field hospital in Damnat Khadeer District, 40 kilometres north of Taiz. UN Human Rights field monitors were denied access to the site, so it has been difficult to verify the death toll and establish who the victims were.

We reiterate that all suspected violations of international human rights law and humanitarian law during the conflict should be investigated, and that the intentional targeting of civilians not taking direct part in the hostilities should be immediately stopped.

We would also like to draw particular attention to the plight of people with disabilities in Yemen. There are an estimated 3,000,000 people with disabilities living in Yemen who are facing serious protection concerns and increasing difficulties in meeting their basic needs. Those who use wheelchairs have limited or no access to public or private transport facilities due to fuel shortages and high fuel prices across the country. As a result, some people with disabilities and their families have been unable to flee to safe areas. People with disabilities who have fled the violence and have been displaced to bigger cities face risks of isolation and other serious challenges. The recent events have led to the closure of 300 organizations that previously provided specialist services for people with disabilities. Some people with disabilities require ongoing medical treatment which has been discontinued. Additionally, children who need specialized education are not able to access those educational institutions or rehabilitation centres.

(2) Serbia

We are concerned by the continued and increasing pressure by Serbian authorities, including members of the ruling Serbian Progressive Party, on Ombudsperson Sasa Jankovic. Such pressures first emerged following his investigation of alleged wrongdoing by the country’s Military Security Agency (VBA), in January this year, and have intensified since the publication of his latest Annual Report on Serbia, on 14 April 2015.

In January, the Ombudsperson voiced concerns relating to the Military Security Agency, including suspicions that the VBA had been illegally spying on opposition parties, union leaders and judges. He also shared information on the obstacles he faced in undertaking an investigation, due to the unwillingness of the VBA to cooperate and deliver necessary documents and responses to questions posed by the Ombudsperson. Soon afterwards, Government officials publicly questioned the professionalism and credibility of the Ombudsperson and his office, including during a Parliamentary hearing on the matter on 28 January.

Following these incidents, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights raised concerns with Serbian authorities. He stressed that the Paris Principles relating to the status of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) clearly stipulate that the national institution “shall hear any person and obtain any information and any documents necessary for assessing situations falling within its competence”. The mandate of national human rights institutions should authorize unannounced and unfettered access to inspect and examine any public premises, documents, equipment and assets without prior written notice. Serbia’s Law on the Protector of Citizens (Ombudsman) stipulates the responsibility of the authorities to cooperate with the Ombudsperson, and to enable access to any premises and to make information available which is of importance for the Ombudsperson’s proceedings, regardless of the degree of confidentiality of such information.

Serbian authorities have assured the High Commissioner of their respect and support for the Ombudsperson’s office and their commitment to properly investigate and prosecute any pressures and threats against the Ombudsperson.

However, a renewed campaign of personal attacks against Jankovic appears to have unfolded over the past three weeks, particularly by a number of media outlets close to the ruling Serbian Progressive Party. These attacks have been further fuelled by negative statements from high-level State officials. Most worryingly, it has been suggested that Jankovic was in some way involved in the death of a person who committed suicide in 1993, and media reports have referred to the Ombudsperson as a “killer”, “gun smuggler” and “suspect”.

We trust that the Government of Serbia will continue to exercise due diligence in connection with any possible pressure, threat, or forms of retaliation against Ombudsperson Jankovic and the institution, and will distance itself from the accusation made against him. Since his appointment in 2007, Jankovic has been a well-respected and credible head of the National Human Rights Institution, which has been awarded “A” Status internationally, and with whom the UN Human Rights Office has engaged very positively.

(3) Honduras

The UN Human Rights Office yesterday signed an agreement with the Government of Honduras to open an office in the country.

The country office, established at the request of the Government of Honduras, will be charged with monitoring and reporting publicly on the human rights situation, helping build the capacity of State institutions and civil society for the promotion and the protection of human rights, as well as conducting public advocacy on human rights issues.

The agreement was signed in Geneva yesterday by Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights Flavia Pansieri and the Honduran Minister for General Government Coordination, Jorge Ramon Hernández Alcerro. Pansieri and Hernández discussed the importance of working together to improve the human rights situation for all in Honduras. The Minister highlighted that the agreement to open the office is a testament of the Honduran Government's commitment to human rights.

The Office is expected to become operational in the second half of 2015.

Later this week, Honduras will undergo the second Universal Periodic Review of its human rights record before the UN Human Rights Council. We hope the Government will make strong commitments to improving the human rights situation in the country and we look forward to supporting it in ensuring the protection of the human rights of all in Honduras.

(4) New albinism micro-site on OHCHR website

We are today launching a fully accessible new micro-site on the OHCHR website dedicated to the issue of albinism. The site, entitled “People with albinism: Not ghosts but human beings” has a wide range of resources on the condition of albinism, which is still profoundly misunderstood, socially and medically. It details some of the key human rights issues that people with albinism face on a daily basis, and tells the stories of 12 champions – people with and without albinism who are working to make a difference, to debunk the myths and ensure that people with albinism can live a life free of stigma – or worse, violence.
The micro-site has been tested for its accessibility, particularly for people with albinism who sometimes have difficulties reading on websites that have vividly-coloured backgrounds and text. The colours of the site were chosen for their neutrality.
The micro-site, which is part of the UN Human Rights Office’s persistent efforts to advocate for people with albinism, can be accessed on http://albinism.ohchr.org.

ENDS


For more information and media requests, please contact Ravina Shamdasani (+41 22 917 9169 / rshamdasani@ohchr.org)  

NEWS RELEASE: UN and international experts release key declaration on Freedom of Expression in



UN and international experts release key declaration on Freedom of Expression in Conflict Situations

RIGA (4 May 2015) – The United Nations Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression, David Kaye,  issued a joint declaration* on ‘Freedom of Expression and Responses to Conflict Situations’ together with special rapporteurs on free expression from the Organization of American States (OAS), the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights and the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media.

“This joint declaration reminds States on their longstanding commitments,” Mr. Kaye said at the World Press Freedom Day International Conference in Riga, Latvia. “Unfortunately, we are aware that the trend is not positive - many journalists, artists and activists are in detention, missing, buried, or deterred from exercising their rights to freedom of opinion and expression.”

The declaration addresses attacks perpetrated in different contexts, such as armed conflicts, terrorist attacks and widespread organised crime. It emphasizes that States should not respond to crisis situations by adopting additional restrictions on freedom of expression, except as strictly justified by the situation. It calls for a number of measures including the protection of journalists and their sources as well as the respect to everyone’s right to privacy.

For the UN Special Rapporteur attacks on a free press violate the letter and spirit of the right to freedom of expression.

“To clamp down on unwanted expression or seal off information from the public, those in power often deploy pretexts instead of legitimate justifications genuinely rooted in the protection of national security or public order,” he said.

“This is particularly harmful in situations of violence and extremism where more space for free speech is so crucial,” the human rights expert stressed.

(*) Check the joint declaration:

ENDS

David Kaye (USA) was appointed as Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression in August 2014 by the United Nations Human Rights Council. Learn more, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomOpinion/Pages/OpinionIndex.aspx

The UN Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights, is the general name of the independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms of the Human Rights Council that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.

For further information and media requests, please contact Marcelo Daher (+41 22 917 9431 / mdaher@ohchr.org) or write to freedex@ohchr.org

For media inquiries related to other UN independent experts:
Xabier Celaya, UN Human Rights – Media Unit (+ 41 22 917 9383 / xcelaya@ohchr.org)  

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:

Storify:        http://storify.com/UNrightswire

MEDIA STATEMENT- South Sudan now 195th State to ratify Convention on the Rights of the Child



UN Committee hails South Sudan’s ratification of Convention on the Rights of the Child

GENEVA (4 May 2015) – The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child has welcomed South Sudan’s ratification* of the Convention on the Rights of the Child and repeated its call for universal ratification of the Convention.
“We applaud South Sudan for ratifying the Convention on the Rights of the Child, thus becoming the 195th State to do so.

The Convention, which is the most widely ratified international human rights treaty, was adopted more than 25 years ago and the rights it sets out are as important today as in 1989. 
These include children’s right to life, to health, to education and to play, as well as the right to family life, to be protected from violence, to not be discriminated against,  and to have their views heard.

We urge States that have ratified the Convention, now including South Sudan, to fulfil their obligations to respect, protect and fulfil the human rights of all children. Ratification is an important step that brings with it a commitment towards implementation.

We also repeat our call for universal ratification of the Convention and call on the United States and Somalia**, that have yet to ratify the Convention, to do so. We also urge States to ratify the three legal instruments that address specific areas of children’s rights, namely the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography; the involvement of children in armed conflict; and enabling children to bring complaints of serious violations of their rights to the Committee.”

The Committee also welcomed South Sudan’s recent ratification of two other key UN human rights conventions and their optional protocols. These are the Convention against Torture (CAT) and the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW).

ENDS

For more information and media requests, please contact Liz Throssell - +41 (0) 22 917 9466 / ethrossell@ohchr.org
BACKGROUND:
*Sudan ratified the Convention on 23 January 2015 and with the formalities complete, it has now been listed on the UN Treaty Collection website as a State Party: https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&lang=en
**Somalia is in the process of finalising the process to ratify the Convention.
The Committee on the Rights of the Child monitors implementation of the Convention by States Parties:   http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRC/Pages/CRCIndex.aspx
Convention on the Rights of the Child: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx
Optional Protocol on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography (ratified to date by 169 States):  http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/OPSCCRC.aspx
Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict  (ratified to date by 159 States): http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/OPACCRC.aspx.
Optional Protocol on a Communications Procedure (ratified to date by 17 States).  This gives children who have exhausted all legal avenues in their own countries the possibility of applying to the Committee. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=A/RES/66/138&Lang=en
Convention on the Elimination of Discriination against Women: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CEDAW.aspx



MEDIA ADVISORY (ENGLISH/GREEK): UN expert on racism and discrimination launches



Greek version, see below

UN expert on racism and discrimination launches first official visit to Greece

GENEVA (1st May 2015) – United Nations Special Rapporteur Mutuma Ruteere will visit Greece from 4 to 8 May 2015 to evaluate the situation of racism and discrimination in the country.

This is the first official mission to Greece by the independent expert mandated by the UN Human Rights Council to assess and report on the situation of racism, racial discrimination and related intolerance in the world.

“This visit will allow me to learn more, first-hand, about the context of racism and discrimination in Greece, as well as about all the initiatives and efforts undertaken by the Government to combat this phenomenon,” Mr. Ruteere said. “I should then be able to provide observations and concrete recommendations to help fight racism and other forms of discrimination in the country.”

The human rights expert, who is visiting the country at the invitation of the Greek Government authorities, is scheduled to meet with Government officials, representatives of the legislative and judicial branches, UN agencies in the country, the National Human Rights Commission and the Ombudsman, as well as a broad range of civil society actors.

Mr. Ruteere will hold a press conference at the end of the visit on Friday, 8 May 2015 at 14h30 at the Journalists' Union premises, 20 Akadimias Street, Athens, to present his preliminary findings and recommendations. Access to the press conference is strictly limited to journalists.

A final report on the visit will be presented by the Special Rapporteur to the UN Human Rights Council in 2016.

ENDS

Mr. Mutuma Ruteere (Kenya) was appointed by the Human Rights Council as Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance in November 2011. As Special Rapporteur, he is independent from any government or organisation and serves in his individual capacity.  Learn more, visit: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Racism/SRRacism/Pages/IndexSRRacism.aspx

The Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.

UN Human Rights, Country Page – Greece:  http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Countries/ENACARegion/Pages/GRIndex.aspx

For further information and media enquiries, please contact:
In Athens: Stella Nanou (+30 693 793 4515 / nanou@unhcr.org) or Thierry del Prado (+30 694 547 1600 / tdelprado@ohchr.org)
In Geneva: Yaye Ba (+41 22 917 9210 / yba@ohchr.org ) or write to racism@ohchr.org

For media inquiries related to other UN independent experts:
Xabier Celaya, UN Human Rights – Media Unit (+ 41 22 917 9383 / xcelaya@ohchr.org)  

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/unitednationshumanrights
Twitter: http://twitter.com/UNrightswire
Google+ gplus.to/unitednationshumanrights   
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/UNOHCHR
        

Check the Universal Human Rights Index: http://uhri.ohchr.org/en 


ΑΝΑΚΟΙΝΩΣΗ ΤΥΠΟΥ

Ειδικός του ΟΗΕ για τον ρατσισμό και τις διακρίσεις στην πρώτη του επίσημη επίσκεψη στην Ελλάδα

ΓΕΝΕΥΗ (30 Απριλίου 2015) – Ο Ειδικός Εισηγητής των Ηνωμένων Εθνών, Mutuma Ruteere, θα επισκεφτεί την Ελλάδα από τις 4 έως τις 8 Μαΐου 2015 για να αξιολογήσει την κατάσταση στη χώρα σε σχέση με τον ρατσισμό και τις διακρίσεις.

Πρόκειται για την πρώτη επίσημη αποστολή στην Ελλάδα του ανεξάρτητου ειδικού που έχει ορίσει το Συμβούλιο Ανθρωπίνων Δικαιωμάτων του ΟΗΕ για την αξιολόγηση και τη σύνταξη εκθέσεων σε σχέση με τον ρατσισμό, τις ρατσιστικές διακρίσεις και τη μισαλλοδοξία ανά τον κόσμο.

«Η επίσκεψη αυτή θα μου επιτρέψει να μάθω περισσότερα, από πρώτο χέρι, για τον ρατσισμό και τις διακρίσεις στην Ελλάδα, καθώς και για τις πρωτοβουλίες και τις προσπάθειες της Κυβέρνησης για την καταπολέμηση αυτού του φαινομένου», είπε ο Ruteere. «Έτσι, θα μπορέσω να κάνω παρατηρήσεις και συγκεκριμένες συστάσεις για να βοηθήσω στην καταπολέμηση του ρατσισμού και άλλων μορφών διάκρισης στη χώρα.»

Ο Ruteere, που επισκέπτεται τη χώρα μετά από πρόσκληση των ελληνικών κυβερνητικών Αρχών, έχει προγραμματίσει συναντήσεις με στελέχη της Κυβέρνησης, εκπροσώπους της νομοθετικής και της δικαστικής εξουσίας, υπηρεσίες του ΟΗΕ στη χώρα, την Εθνική Επιτροπή για τα Δικαιώματα του Ανθρώπου, το Συνήγορο του Πολίτη, καθώς και με πληθώρα παραγόντων της κοινωνίας των πολιτών.

Ο ειδικός για τα ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα θα δώσει συνέντευξη τύπου στο τέλος της επίσκεψής του, την Παρασκευή, 8 Μαΐου 2015, στις 14.30, στα γραφεία της Ένωσης Συντακτών Ημερήσιων Εφημερίδων Αθηνών, για να παρουσιάσει τα πρώτα ευρήματα και συστάσεις.

Η τελική έκθεση θα παρουσιαστεί από τον Ειδικό Εισηγητή στο Συμβούλιο Ανθρωπίνων Δικαιωμάτων του ΟΗΕ, το 2016.

ΤΕΛΟΣ

Ο κ. Mutuma Ruteere (Κένυα) ορίστηκε από το Συμβούλιο Ανθρωπίνων Δικαιωμάτων ως Ειδικός Εισηγητής για τις σύγχρονες μορφές ρατσισμού, ρατσιστικών διακρίσεων, ξενοφοβίας και μισαλλοδοξίας τον Νοέμβριο του 2011. Ως Ειδικός Εισηγητής, είναι ανεξάρτητος από οποιαδήποτε Κυβέρνηση ή οργανισμό και ενεργεί ατομικά.  Για να μάθετε περισσότερα, επισκεφτείτε τη διεύθυνση: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Racism/SRRacism/Pages/IndexSRRacism.aspx

Ανθρώπινα Δικαιώματα ΟΗΕ, Σελίδα χώρας - Ελλάδα:

Για περισσότερες πληροφορίες ή ερωτήσεις από μέσα ενημέρωσης, παρακαλείσθε να επικοινωνήσετε με:
Αθήνα: Στέλλα Νάνου (+30 693 793 4515 / nanou@unhcr.org) ή Thierry del Prado (+30 694 547 1600 /  tdelprado@ohchr.org)
Γενεύη: Yaye Ba (+41 22 917 9210 / yba@ohchr.org ) ή να στείλετε e-mail στη διεύθυνση: racism@ohchr.org

Για ερωτήσεις από μέσα ενημέρωσης προς άλλους ανεξάρτητους ειδικούς του ΟΗΕ:
Xabier Celaya, Γραφείο Ανθρωπίνων Δικαιωμάτων ΟΗΕ – Μονάδα Μέσων Ενημέρωσης (+ 41 22 917 9383 / xcelaya@ohchr.org)  

Ακολουθήστε το Γραφείο Ανθρωπίνων Δικαιωμάτων του ΟΗΕ στα μέσα κοινωνικής δικτύωσης:
       
Δείτε τον Οικουμενικό Δείκτη Ανθρωπίνων Δικαιωμάτων: http://uhri.ohchr.org/en


07. 05. 2015.

COMMUNIQUÉ DE PRESSE (FRANCAIS/ENGLISH) - La jeune démocratie du Burundi mise à risque



La version anglaise se trouve ci-dessous
English version, see below

La jeune démocratie du Burundi mise à risque par les violences pré-électorales, préviennent des experts de l’ONU
  
GENÈVE (30 avril 2015) – Un groupe d’experts de l’ONU* a condamné aujourd’hui les violences au Burundi et a exhorté les autorités à respecter les droits de l’homme, y compris la liberté d’expression et le droit de réunion pacifique. Ils ont également demandé qu’une enquête approfondie et indépendante soit menée sur les violations des droits de l’homme commises afin que les auteurs soient traduits en justice.

Au cours des derniers jours, le Burundi a subi une vague de morts violentes, d’arrestations arbitraires et d’intimidation, y compris contre des défenseurs des droits de l’homme, ainsi que la fermeture de médias. Ceci se serait produit dans le contexte de manifestations pacifiques contre la candidature du président sortant, Pierre Nkurunziza pour briguer un troisième mandat présidentiel. En réponse, les forces de sécurité auraient violemment réprimé les manifestants avec des armes à feux à balles réelles, des grenades et des gaz lacrymogènes. Les récentes informations indiquent que l’internet serait bloqué dans le pays.  

« Nous exhortons toutes les parties à résoudre leurs différends par le dialogue, à éviter d’utiliser un langage incendiaire ou des discours haineux, et à renoncer à la violence. Cet appel est également fait aux différentes parties des forces de sécurité du pays, lesquels doivent remplir leur fonctions d’une manière non partisane », ont souligné les experts internationaux.

« Les événements troublants de ces derniers jours devraient également être considérés en prenant compte du rôle croissant joué par des milices de jeunes depuis plus d’une année. Les actions de harcèlement, d’intimidation et de violence d’une de ces milices - les Imbonerakure - sont ouvertement cautionnées par le parti au pouvoir. Nous exhortons les autorités à intervenir pour faire cesser ces activités. Les milices, quel que soit leur bord, devraient être immédiatement désarmées », ont indiqué les experts indépendants.

« Un processus électoral qui manque de crédibilité, et encore plus qui déclenche la violence, est un énorme revers pour le Burundi », ont-ils souligné.

Le Burundi a pris des mesures importantes pour préserver la paix depuis l’Accord d’Arusha en 2000 et en particulier depuis l’adoption de la Constitution de 2005 qui institutionnalise un accord de partage du pouvoir entre les groupes ethniques. Cela a considérablement contribué à la transformation des relations entre les différentes communautés au Burundi. Les efforts importants en vue de la démobilisation et la réinsertion, combinés à une représentation ethnique convenu dans toutes les institutions officielles, y compris dans le secteur de la sécurité, ont permis au pays d’assurer une certaine stabilité depuis 2009.

« Ces progrès importants réalisés au cours des 15 dernières années risquent d’être compromis si les autorités choisissent de ne pas prendre les mesures nécessaires pour empêcher de nouvelles violations. Ceci principalement implique de rompre la ‘tradition d’impunité’ qui règne dans le pays depuis trop longtemps », ont mis en garde les experts.

«Dans une société qui a été témoin des cycles de violence récurrente à une échelle massive pour près de 50 ans, et pour lesquels les victimes n’ont reçu aucune réparation ou recours pour les violations subies, personne ne peut se permettre qu’éclate un nouveau conflit », ont-ils conclu.

(*) Les experts: Mads Andenas, Président-Rapporteur du Groupe de travail sur la détention arbitraire; Pablo de Greiff, Rapporteur spécial sur la promotion de la vérité, de la justice, de la réparation et des garanties de non-répétition; Michel Forst, Rapporteur spécial sur la situation des défenseurs des droits de l’homme; Christof Heynes, Rapporteur spécial sur les exécutions extrajudiciaires, sommaires ou arbitraires; David Kaye, Rapporteur spécial sur la promotion et la protection du droit à la liberté d’opinion et d’expression; Maina Kiai, Rapporteur spécial sur le droit de réunion pacifique et d’association.

FIN

Les experts indépendants font partie de ce qui est désigné sous le nom des procédures spéciales du Conseil des droits de l’homme. Les procédures spéciales, l’organe le plus important d’experts indépendants du système des droits de l’homme de l’ONU, est le terme général appliqué aux mécanismes d’enquête et de suivi indépendants du Conseil qui s’adressent aux situations spécifiques des pays ou aux questions thématiques partout dans le monde. Les experts des procédures spéciales travaillent à titre bénévole; ils ne font pas partie du personnel de l’ONU et ils ne reçoivent pas de salaire pour leur travail. Ils sont indépendants des gouvernements et des organisations et ils exercent leurs fonctions à titre indépendant.


Pour toute question complémentaire et demandes de presse, veuillez contacter Julia Raue (+41 22 917 9118/

Pour les demandes des médias relatives à d’autres experts indépendants des Nations Unies :
Xabier Celaya, Droits de l’homme de l’ONU – Unité média (+ 41 22 917 9383 / xcelaya@ohchr.org)  

ONU Droits de l’homme, suivez-nous sur les réseaux sociaux :  



NEWS RELEASE

Pre-election violence endangers Burundi’s young democracy, UN rights experts warn
  
GENEVA (30 April 2015) – A group of United Nations experts* today condemned the violence in Burundi and urged the authorities to uphold human rights, including freedom of expression and the right to peaceful assembly. They also called for a thorough and independent investigation into the human rights violations so that the perpetrators are brought to justice.

Over the past days, Burundi has suffered a wave of killings, arbitrary arrests, intimidation, the closure of media outlets and the targeting of human rights defenders. This has taken place in the context of peaceful protests against the decision of the ruling party to have incumbent President Nkurunziza run for a third presidential term. In response, security forces violently cracked down on the protesters with live ammunition, grenades and tear gas. Most recent reports indicate that the internet is now being blocked throughout the country.

“We urge all parties to resolve differences through dialogue, avoid using inflammatory language or hate speech, and to refrain from violence. This call is also made to various parts of the country’s security sector, which should fulfil their role in a non-partisan manner,” they said.

The international experts emphasised that the troubling events of the past days should also be seen against the increasingly important role that youth militias have played for more than a year. “Authorities must urgently intervene to stop these activities and youth militias of all sides should be immediately disarmed,” they said, warning that “the actions of harassment, intimidation and violence of one militia – the Imbonerakure - are openly condoned by the ruling party.”

“An electoral process that lacks credibility –not to speak about one that triggers outright violence—is a huge setback for Burundi”, the human rights experts highlighted.
 
Burundi has taken important steps to preserve peace with the Arusha Agreement in 2000, and in particular the adoption of the 2005 Constitution which institutionalizes a power-sharing arrangement between ethnic groups. This has significantly contributed to the transformation of relations between different communities in Burundi.

Massive demobilisation and reintegration efforts, combined with agreed ethnic representation in all official institutions, including across the security sector, have further enabled the country to ensure a degree of stability since 2009.

“These significant achievements made over the past 15 years will be put in jeopardy if the authorities fail to take measures to prevent further violations,” the experts warned. “Burundi must also break with its ‘tradition of impunity’ that has reigned for much too long.”
 
“In a society, which has witnessed cycles of recurring violence on a massive scale for close to 50 years, and in which victims have seen no redress for the violations suffered, no one can afford another conflict,” they concluded.

(*) The experts: Mads Andenas, Chair-Rapporteur of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; Pablo de Greiff, Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence; Michel Forst, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders; Christof Heynes, Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; David Kaye, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; Maina Kiai, Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association.

ENDS

The United Nations human rights experts are part of what it is known as ‘Special Procedures’, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system. ‘Special Procedures’ is the general name of the independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms of the Human Rights Council that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity. Learn more, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/SP/Pages/Welcomepage.aspx  

UN Human Rights, Country Page – Burundi: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Countries/AfricaRegion/Pages/BIIndex.aspx  

For more information and media requests, please contact Julia Raue (+41 22 917 9118 / jraue@ohchr.org or srtruth@ohchr.org)

For media inquiries related to other UN independent experts:
Xabier Celaya, UN Human Rights – Media Unit (+ 41 22 917 9383 / xcelaya@ohchr.org)  

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:

MEDIA STATEMENT - “Address the democratic deficit and Cambodia will prosper”



“Address the democratic deficit and Cambodia will prosper” – Outgoing UN Special Rapporteur

GENEVA (30 April 2015) – The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia, Surya P. Subedi, today issued the following statement as he completes his six-year term:

“These six years have gone by very quickly. I have had the privilege to work with the Royal Government of Cambodia, the opposition parties and a range of other stakeholders in Cambodian society in writing my reports on judicial, parliamentary, electoral and land reforms, and in the follow up of my recommendations. It gives me a sense of satisfaction that some of my recommendations have been implemented and some others are in the process of being implemented.

Cambodia has come a long way during this time. The reform agenda has advanced with the enactment of the three fundamental laws on the judiciary, the amendment of the Constitution to grant the National Election Committee a constitutional status, implementation of the land-titling programme under Directive 001, review and revocation of some economic and other land concessions and adoption of some guidelines on land evictions.

At the same time, in these and other areas, Cambodia still has some way to go to meet the international benchmark flowing from the international human rights treaties ratified by the country and to make the ideals of a liberal democracy a reality for its people. The three fundamental laws on the judiciary have their own flaws. So has the package of electoral reform implemented by the ruling and the opposition party.
 
Of course the reforms will not immediately, overnight, improve the situation of human rights for people in the country. The impact of some of these reforms will be felt perhaps in five or ten years’ time. And progress will depend on the implementation of these laws with sincerity and diligence.

While the Government has a duty to serve as a pillar for human rights and to ensure enjoyment of human rights for all, the opposition party must also not disappoint the people who came out in such numbers to support them in the past two years.

My parting advice to the leaders of the country, both in the Government and the opposition, would be to be principled in what they do. The reform process and the act of governance should be underpinned by the principles of legitimacy, transparency, consultation, and participatory democracy. The reform agenda is not the business of the ruling and opposition parties alone. It is a national agenda to which people from all walks of life should have an opportunity to contribute and have ownership.

The youth in particular, here in Cambodia as much as elsewhere in the world, are increasingly aware of their rights, and will continue to demand a better life and better performance and accountability from their State institutions to enable that to be achieved. While the political reconciliation between the two main political parties is welcome, they should strive hard to achieve wider reconciliation within Cambodian society and address the grievances of the people who have suffered from violations of their rights.

For genuine, long-lasting stability in the country, it is crucial that the people of Cambodia feel that they are well served – served, not ruled – by their political representatives. The extent to which they feel their interests are served will determine whether they express their will through their representatives or search for other means to do so.

Important laws have been enacted in recent past without meaningful public participation, and this worrying trend seems to be continuing with regard to other pending laws. This sends an unhelpful message to the public that the old ways of managing the country have not changed, and it is an injustice to the true reformers that I believe exist in both main parties who are doing the best they can within the means and the limits of their authority.

My advice is to open the critical process of law-making, and win over the critics – not by pushing them aside, but with the strength of your arguments and a demonstrated willingness to take the best route to solutions, no matter who they are proposed by.

In the area of land rights, extraordinary measures being taken now that explicitly aim, for the first time during my mandate, to restore land to the people from whom it was taken. Such measures give strong reasons for hope. I would encourage such measures to continue in a way that addresses all those with complaints fairly, rather than sporadically or for political gains.

Guaranteeing the independence of the judiciary will also be indispensable. Notwithstanding a number of positive elements of the three fundamental laws on the judiciary, the opaque process of their elaboration and enactment will continue to colour the way in which these laws are regarded until they are amended to guarantee the independence of the one institution that was established to provide final resolution to disputes.

While there is still a considerable way to go toward realising the vision of a liberal democracy and the objectives set out in the Paris Peace Agreements of 1991 which heralded a new democratic dawn for the country, I conclude my mandate with full confidence that Cambodia will get there – its vibrant people will ensure that it does.

It has been an honour and a privilege for me to have been able to make a contribution to the strengthening of the rule of law, democracy and human rights in the country at this historical juncture. With the assurance that I will remain forever a friend of Cambodia, I wish the people of Cambodia all the best in accomplishing these objectives and in building a more prosperous, tolerant, cohesive, equitable and fairer society for all in the years to come.

I thank the UN Human Rights Council for placing its trust and confidence in me by appointing me to this position in March 2009 and for renewing my mandate annually and then for an unprecedented term of two years twice, providing me with the stability needed to follow a more strategic approach.

It has been an immense privilege to have served the people of Cambodia and the UN Human Rights Council over the past six years. I would like to thank the Royal Government of Cambodia, the leaders of the opposition parties, human rights activists and the international diplomatic community based in Phnom Penh for their cooperation with me throughout my mandate.

My sincere thanks also go to the dedicated, committed and professional staff of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights both in Phnom Penh and Geneva for their excellent support. Above all, I would like to thank the people of Cambodia, especially the youth, for the welcome, warmth and support extended to me.

The UN Human Rights Council has appointed a very able person, Professor Rhona Smith, to succeed me. I hope the Government of Cambodia will extend its full cooperation to her and I wish her every success in assisting Cambodia towards building a stronger democracy and promoting genuine rule of law and greater respect for human rights in the country.”

ENDS

Professor Surya P. Subedi was appointed by the UN Human Rights Council as the UN Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in Cambodia in March 2009. He is currently Professor of International Law at the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom and a practising Barrister of the Middle Temple in London. He is the Vice President of the Asian Society of International Law and editor of its flagship publication – the Asian Journal of International Law published by Cambridge University Press. For more information, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/SP/CountriesMandates/KH/Pages/SRCambodia.aspx

The Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.

Check the Special Rapporteur’s latest report to the Human Rights Council (A/HRC/24/36): http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session24/Pages/ListReports.aspx

UN Human Rights, country page – Cambodia: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Countries/AsiaRegion/Pages/KHIndex.aspx  

For additional information and media enquiries, please contact: Ms. Olga Nakajo (+41 22 928 9348 / onakajo@ohchr.org) or write to srcambodia@ohchr.org

For media inquiries related to other UN independent experts:
Xabier Celaya, UN Human Rights – Media Unit (+ 41 22 917 9383 / xcelaya@ohchr.org)  

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media: