Translate

03. 04. 2015.



French version below

UN Human Rights Chief alarmed by Thai Government’s adoption of potentially unlimited and “draconian” powers

GENEVA (2 April 2015) – UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein on Thursday expressed alarm at the Thai military Government’s announcement that it has invoked an article of the Interim Constitution that bestows unfettered authority on the head of the military government.                 The article grants sweeping law enforcement powers over the civilian population to military personnel, potentially overriding a wide range of human rights guaranteed under national and international law.

On Wednesday, the military Government of Prime Minister General Prayuth Chan-ocha was granted permission to revoke martial law, and replace it with extraordinary powers under article 44 of the Interim Constitution.

“Normally I would warmly welcome the lifting of martial law – and indeed strongly advocated for it to be lifted in Thailand,” the High Commissioner said.  “But I am alarmed at the decision to replace martial law with something even more draconian, which bestows unlimited powers on the current Prime Minister without any judicial oversight at all.                                                                This clearly leaves the door wide open to serious violations of fundamental human rights. I appeal to the Government to ensure that these extraordinary powers, even if provided for by the Interim Constitution, will nevertheless not be exercised imprudently.”

Under an Order published by the National Council of Peace and Order (NCPO) elaborating the application of article 44, military personnel down to the rank of Second Lieutenant may be appointed as “peace and order maintenance officers” with sweeping law enforcement powers, including to search, arrest and detain without judicial oversight. In addition, they will be empowered “to conduct any other action” as ordered by the NCPO.  

Article 44 effectively allows the head of the NCPO, General Chan-ocha, to issue any legislative, executive or judicial order. Such orders, and any action based on them, would automatically be deemed legal, constitutional and conclusive. 
Even violations of human rights under international and existing national laws would be considered legal, and no avenues of accountability could be pursued. The peace and order maintenance officers are provided with immunity from criminal, civil, and disciplinary liabilities for any action they may take while acting under these extraordinary powers.

“The NCPO Order issued on Wednesday also annihilates freedom of expression,” Zeid said. “It explicitly gives these military peace and order maintenance officers the authority to prohibit ‘the reporting of news’ or sale or distribution of books, publications, or any other medium that ‘may create public fear or are intended to distort news and information to cause misunderstandings which could affect national security or public order.
’ Freedom of assembly also remains severely curtailed, with heavy punishment earmarked for protesters who gather in groups of more than five.”

“In effect, this means the sweeping away of all checks and balances on the power of the Government, rendering the lifting of martial law meaningless,” Zeid said.

“I urge the Thai Government to comply with its obligations under international human rights law and promptly restore normal civilian rule of law, as it pledged to do after the coup in May last year,” Zeid said.

ENDS

For media enquiries please contact: Rupert Colville (+ 41 22 917 9767 / rcolville@ohchr.org) or Cécile Pouilly (+ 41 22 917 9310 / cpouilly@ohchr.org).

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:

 
Le Haut-Commissaire aux droits de l’homme alarmé par l’adoption par le gouvernement thaïlandais de pouvoirs potentiellement illimités et « draconiens »
  
GENEVE (2 avril 2015) – Le Haut-Commissaire des Nations Unies aux droits de l'homme Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein a fait part jeudi de sa préoccupation après que le Gouvernement militaire thaïlandais ait annoncé avoir invoqué un article de la Constitution provisoire conférant une autorité illimitée au chef du gouvernement militaire. 
Cet article accorde au personnel militaire des pouvoirs coercitifs considérables sur la population civile, bafouant potentiellement un large éventail de droits de l’homme garantis par le droit national et international.

Mercredi, le Gouvernement militaire du Premier Ministre et Général Prayuth Chan-ocha a obtenu l’autorisation de révoquer la loi martiale et de la remplacer par des pouvoirs extraordinaires en vertu de l’article 44 de la Constitution provisoire.

« En temps ordinaire, je saluerais chaleureusement la levée de la loi martiale. J’ai d’ailleurs vivement plaidé en faveur de sa levée en Thaïlande », a déclaré le Haut-Commissaire. « Mais je suis alarmé par la décision de remplacer la loi martiale par quelque chose d’encore plus draconien, qui confère des pouvoirs illimités au Premier Ministre actuel en l’absence de tout contrôle judiciaire. 

Cela laisse la porte grande ouverte à des violations graves des droits de l’homme fondamentaux. J’appelle le gouvernement à garantir que ces pouvoirs extraordinaires, bien que prévus par la Constitution provisoire, ne seront pas exercés de manière imprudente. »  

En vertu d’une ordonnance publiée par le Conseil national pour la paix et l'ordre (NCPO) qui élabore la mise en application de l’article 44, les membres du personnel militaire à partir du grade de sous-lieutenant peuvent être désignés « officiers de maintien de la paix et de l’ordre », avec des pouvoirs coercitifs considérables, y compris celui de perquisitionner, d’arrêter et de détenir en dehors de tout contrôle judiciaire. Ils auront, par ailleurs, le pouvoir de « mener toute autre action » ordonnée par le NCPO.

L’article 44 permet effectivement au chef du NCPO, le Général Chan-ocha, de rendre toute ordonnance législative, exécutive ou judiciaire. De telles ordonnances ainsi que toute action se basant sur celles-ci, seraient automatiquement considérées comme légales, constitutionnelles et probantes. Même les violations des droits de l’homme au regard des lois nationales et internationales existantes seraient considérées comme légales et aucune voie de recours pour que des comptes soient rendus ne pourrait être envisagée. Les officiers de maintien de la paix et de l’ordre bénéficieraient de l’immunité pénale, civile et disciplinaire pour toute action qu’ils pourraient entreprendre en vertu de ces pouvoirs extraordinaires.  

« L’ordonnance du NCPO publiée mercredi annihile également la liberté d’expression », a déclaré Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein. « Elle donne à ces officiers militaires de maintien de la paix et de l’ordre l’autorité d’interdire “la diffusion de nouvelles”, la vente ou la distribution de livres, de publications ou de tout autre médium qui “pourrait susciter la peur du public ou qui sont destinés à déformer les nouvelles et les informations afin d’engendrer des incompréhensions qui pourraient toucher la sécurité nationale ou l’ordre public”. La liberté de réunion demeure également sévèrement restreinte, avec de fortes punitions pour les manifestants qui se réunissent en groupes de plus de cinq personnes. »

« En pratique, cela signifie balayer tous les contrôles et les équilibres sur l'exercice du pouvoir gouvernemental, privant ainsi de sens la levée de la loi martiale », a déclaré Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein.

« J’exhorte le Gouvernement thaïlandais à respecter ses obligations au regard du droit international des droits de l’homme et à restaurer sans tarder l’état de droit normal et civil, comme il avait promis de le faire après le coup en mai l’an dernier », a déclaré Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein.

FIN

Pour des informations additionnelles et des demandes des médias, veuillez contacter Rupert Colville (+41 22 917 9767 ou rcolville@ohchr.org) ou Cécile Pouilly (+41 22 917 9310 ou cpouilly@ohchr.org)

ONU Droits de l’homme, suivez-nous sur les réseaux sociaux :  
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/unitednationshumanrights
Twitter: http://twitter.com/UNrightswire
Google+ gplus.to/unitednationshumanrights   

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/UNOHCHR

NEWS RELEASE - UN Human Rights Committee deplores Indonesia's response to its call to stop e



UN Human Rights Committee deplores Indonesia’s response to its call to stop executions for drug-related crimes

GENEVA (2 April  2015)  - The UN Human Rights Committee has given Indonesia the lowest possible evaluation for its failure to respond to the Committee’s call in 2013 to stop executing prisoners for drug-related crimes.

After a regular review of Indonesia’s human rights record, the Committee in August 2013 urged the State to reinstate the de facto moratorium on the death penalty and to ensure that, if capital punishment was maintained, it was only for the most serious crimes, which do not include drug-related offences. 

The Committee also called on Indonesia to review its legislation so offences involving narcotics were not punishable by the death penalty.

In a follow-up evaluation of Indonesia this week, Committee members voiced concern at the recent executions in Indonesia and regretted that the State had not amended its legislation as requested. They awarded Indonesia a rare E grade on the scale of A to E, where A is largely satisfactory and E indicates the measures taken go against the Committee's recommendation.

Indonesia had argued that, given the severe impact and the challenges posed by drug-related crimes to the nation’s survival and its young generation, it considered such offences as among the most serious to which the death penalty may apply.

Article 6* of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Indonesia is a State Party, does allow for the death penalty in certain very restricted cases. The Committee has repeatedly stressed that drug-related offences are not such cases and that capital punishment for drug-related offences does not comply with Article 6 of the Covenant.

The Human Rights Committee monitors implementation by States Parties of the ICCPR by means of regular review and, where applicable, a follow-up procedure to analyse a State’s response to the most pressing issues.

The Committee also urges all States to ratify the Second Optional Protocol to the Covenant, which aims at the abolition of the death penalty. In 2013, it called on Indonesia to do so.

ENDS

For more information and media requests, please contact:  Liz Throssell ethrossell@ohchr.org / 41 22 917 9466 / 41 79 752 0488 or Kate Fox kfox@ohchr.org/ 41 22 917 9398 or
*Article 6 of the ICCPR :

1. Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

2. In countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law in force at the time of the commission of the crime and not contrary to the provisions of the present Covenant and to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This penalty can only be carried out pursuant to a final judgement rendered by a competent court.

3. When deprivation of life constitutes the crime of genocide, it is understood that nothing in this article shall authorize any State Party to the present Covenant to derogate in any way from any obligation assumed under the provisions of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

4. Anyone sentenced to death shall have the right to seek pardon or commutation of the sentence. Amnesty, pardon or commutation of the sentence of death may be granted in all cases.

5. Sentence of death shall not be imposed for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age and shall not be carried out on pregnant women.

6. Nothing in this article shall be invoked to delay or to prevent the abolition of capital punishment by any State Party to the present Covenant. 

General Comment on article 6, on the right to life (16th session, 1982): http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=INT%2fCCPR%2fGEC%2f6630&Lang=enhttp://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=INT%2fCCPR%2fGEC%2f6630&Lang=en

 UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:


Storify:http://storify.com/UNrightswire         

AVIS AUX MEDIAS (FRANCAIS/ENGLISH) - Discrimination contre les femmes: Groupe d’



La version anglaise se trouve ci-dessous
English version, see below

Discrimination contre les femmes: Groupe d’expertes de l’ONU en mission au Sénégal
  
GENÈVE (1 avril 2015) – Le Groupe de Travail sur la question de la discrimination contre les femmes dans la législation et dans la pratique entreprendra sa première visite officielle au Sénégal du 7 au 17 Avril pour évaluer les progrès accomplis vers la réalisation de l’égalité des sexes et la protection et la promotion des droits humains des femmes.

« Le Groupe de Travail s’intéresse particulièrement aux réformes législatives et politiques qui ont été mises en œuvre par le Gouvernement du Sénégal pour promouvoir les droits des femmes et l’égalité des sexes», a déclaré l’experte des droits de l’homme Emna Aouij, qui est actuellement la Présidente du Groupe de Travail.

« Nous allons accorder une attention particulière aux droits des femmes à la santé et la sécurité, en considérant les progrès et bonnes pratiques en vue d’éliminer la discrimination contre les femmes dans ces domaines. Nous examinerons également les aspects de la législation et la pratique qui affectent la participation des femmes dans la famille et la vie culturelle, la vie politique et publique ainsi que leur accès à l’éducation, au travail, aux services sociaux et à la justice », a-t-elle ajouté.

Au cours de sa visite de neuf jours, Mme. Aouij rencontrera des responsables étatiques au niveau national et local, des représentants d’organisations de la société civile et de l’ONU, ainsi que des experts et des universitaires.

L’experte se rendra à Dakar, ainsi que dans les régions de Kaolack, Diourbel et Thiès afin de recueillir des informations de première main sur les questions liées à la discrimination contre les femmes dans divers contextes, y compris les femmes victimes de formes multiples de discrimination.

Une conférence de presse pour partager les conclusions préliminaires de cette visite se tiendra le vendredi 17 Avril à 11h dans la salle de conférence du Haut-Commissariat aux droits de l’homme, Route du King Fahd Palace, 20 Almadies, BP 154 Dakar. L’accès à la conférence de presse est strictement limité aux journalistes

Suite à sa visite, le Groupe de Travail présentera un rapport contenant ses conclusions et recommandations au Conseil des droits de l’homme des Nations Unies en Juin 2016.

FIN

Le Groupe de travail des Nations Unies sur la question de la discrimination contre les femmes en droit et dans la pratique a été créé par le Conseil de droits de l’homme en 2011 pour identifier, de promouvoir et d’échanger des vues, en consultation avec les États et les autres acteurs, sur les bonnes pratiques liées à l’élimination des lois que la discrimination contre les femmes. Le Groupe est également chargé de développer un dialogue avec les États et les autres acteurs sur les lois qui ont un effet discriminatoire en ce qui concerne les femmes.

Le Groupe de Travail est composé de cinq expertes indépendantes. La Présidente-Rapporteur est Emna Aouij (Tunisie), la Vice-Présidente Rapporteur est Eleonora Zielinska (Pologne) et les autres membres sont Mme Kamala Chandrakirana (Indonésie), Mme Alda Facio (Costa Rica) et Mme Frances Raday (Israël/Royaume-Uni). Pour plus d’information, connectez-vous sur : http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Women/WGWomen/Pages/WGWomenIndex.aspx  

Les experts indépendants font partie de ce qui est désigné sous le nom des procédures spéciales du Conseil des droits de l’homme. Les procédures spéciales, l’organe le plus important d’experts indépendants du Système des droits de l’homme de l’ONU, est le terme général appliqué aux mécanismes d’enquête et de suivi indépendants du Conseil qui s’adressent aux situations spécifiques des pays ou aux questions thématiques partout dans le monde. Les experts des procédures spéciales travaillent à titre bénévole; ils ne font pas partie du personnel de l’ONU et ils ne reçoivent pas de salaire pour leur travail. Ils sont indépendants des gouvernements et des organisations et ils exercent leurs fonctions à titre indépendant.


Pour toute question complémentaire et demandes de presse, veuillez contacter:
À Dakar : Caroline Ouaffo Wafang (+221 77 740 05 09/ couaffowafang@ohchr.org)
À Genève : Bernadette Arditi (+41 22 917 9159 / mobile : +41 79 444 4078 /  barditi@ohchr.org)

Pour les demandes des médias relatives à d’autres experts indépendants de l’ONU :
Xabier Celaya – Unité média (+ 41 22 917 9383 / xcelaya@ohchr.org)  

ONU Droits de l’homme, suivez-nous sur les réseaux sociaux :  

Consultez l’Index universel des droits de l’homme : http://uhri.ohchr.org/fr


MEDIA ADVISORY

Discrimination against women: UN expert group launches first official visit to Senegal
  
GENEVA (1 April 2015) – The United Nations Working Group on discrimination against women in law and in practice will undertake its first official visit to Senegal from 7 to 17 April to assess the progress made towards achieving gender equality and the protection and promotion of women’s human rights.

“The Working Group is particularly interested in legislative reforms and policies that have been implemented by the Government of Senegal to promote women’s rights and gender equality,” said human rights expert Emna Aouij, who currently heads the expert group.

“We will pay specific attention to women’s rights to health and safety, looking at achievements and good practices to eliminate discrimination against women in these areas. We will also be looking at aspects of law and practice which affect women’s participation in the family and in the cultural life, public and political life as well as their access to justice education, labour and social services,” she added.

During its nine-day visit, Ms. Aouij will meet with Government officials at national and local levels, representatives of civil society organizations and of the UN, as well as experts and academics.

The expert will visit Dakar, Kaolack, Diourbel and Thies to gather first-hand information on issues related to discrimination against women in various contexts, including women victims of multiple forms of discrimination.

A press conference to share the delegation’s preliminary findings will be held Friday 17 April at 11h at OHCHR conference room, Route du King Fahd Palace, 20 Almadies, BP 154 Dakar.  Access to the press conference is strictly limited to journalists.

Following its visit, the Working Group will present a report with its conclusions and recommendations to the UN Human Rights Council in June 2016.

ENDS

The UN Working Group on the issue of discrimination against women in law and in practice was created by the Human Rights Council in 2011 to identify, promote and exchange views, in consultation with States and other actors, on good practices related to the elimination of laws that discriminate against women. The Group is also tasked with developing a dialogue with States and other actors on laws that have a discriminatory impact where women are concerned.

The Working Group is composed of five independent experts: the Current Chair-Rapporteur is Ms. Emna Aouij (Tunisia), Vice-President: Ms. Eleonora Zielinska (Poland), Ms. Kamala Chandrakirana (Indonesia), Ms. Alda Facio (Costa Rica) and Ms. Frances Raday (Israel/United Kingdom). Learn more, log on to:  http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Women/WGWomen/Pages/WGWomenIndex.aspx

The independent experts are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.

UN Human Rights, country page – Senegal: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/countries/AfricaRegion/Pages/SNIndex.aspx

For inquiries and media requests, please contact:
In Dakar: Caroline Ouaffo Wafang (+221 77 740 05 09/ couaffowafang@ohchr.org)
In Geneva: Bernadette Arditi (+41 22 917 9159 / mobile: +41 79 444 4078 /   barditi@ohchr.org)

For media inquiries related to other UN independent experts:
Xabier Celaya – Media Unit (+ 41 22 917 9383 / xcelaya@ohchr.org)  

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:

NEWS RELEASE - UN expert dismayed over Thai leader’s intimidating statements against



UN expert dismayed over Thai leader’s intimidating statements against freedom of the press

GENEVA (1 April 2015) – United Nations expert on freedom of expression David Kaye today urged the Government of Thailand to unequivocally distance itself from the Thai’s leader intimidating statements against freedom of the press, and take immediate measures to allow space for debate and freedom of expression.

General Prayuth Chan-ocha, the leader of the coup that deposed the elected government of Thailand and assumed powers as Prime Minister in 2014, has said recently that journalists who criticize him or ‘causes divisions’ could be subjected to execution, and that he enjoys ‘the power to close down the media, arrest people, order for people to be shot.’

“I condemn General Prayuth’s statements categorically,” the UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression stressed. “After a year of killings and terrible violence against journalists worldwide, such statements are simply outrageous”.

The Special Rapporteur noted that he receives reports from all over the world about attacks, killings and record numbers of journalists imprisoned, “designed to silence criticism and deny citizens the right of access to information.”

“Journalists of all kinds perform one of the most fundamental tasks in a democratic society, throwing light on whether and how Governments behave in accordance with the rule of law or engage in corruption and human rights abuses,” he said. “Intimidation of journalists is by definition an attack on the public’s right to know.”

“There is no sense that General Prayuth spoke in jest,” the expert said. “But even if he did, the idea that the killing of journalists – let alone the shutting down of media in light of criticism – can be a laughing matter is reprehensible.”

The Special Rapporteur stated that Thailand should take immediate steps to lift the nationwide imposition of martial law, while expressing strong concerns about possible invocation of section 44 of the Interim Constitution that would further provide General Prayuth an unlimited authority to issue legislative, executive or judicial order.

“Freedom of expression and independent journalism, uninhibited by fear of reprisals, contribute to public debate and are essential for building inclusive societies and democracies,” Mr. Kaye said. “This includes the right of everyone’s to express criticism of public authorities.”

“Not only Governments and public officials should exhibit respect for the role of journalists, but actually should publicly condemn all forms of threats and attacks against journalists at the highest political level and ensure no one is subject to intimidations,” the human rights expert stressed.

The Special Rapporteur also expressed concerned with the increasing arrests and detentions under lese majesté law and Computer Crime Act, and called for an end to the criminalization of dissenting opinions. “This is particularly crucial now at the moment of drafting the new Constitution, which will shape the future of the country,” the expert concluded.

ENDS

David Kaye (USA) was appointed as Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression in August 2014 by the United Nations Human Rights Council. Learn more, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomOpinion/Pages/OpinionIndex.aspx

The UN Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights, is the general name of the independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms of the Human Rights Council that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.

UN Human Rights, country page – Thailand: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Countries/AsiaRegion/Pages/THIndex.aspx

For further information and media requests, please contact Marcelo Daher (+41 22 917 9431 / mdaher@ohchr.org) or write to freedex@ohchr.org

For media inquiries related to other UN independent experts:
Xabier Celaya, UN Human Rights – Media Unit (+ 41 22 917 9383 / xcelaya@ohchr.org)  

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:

NEWS RELEASE - Tanzania: Widows’ eviction highlights need to abolish or amend d



Widows’ eviction highlights need to abolish or amend Tanzania’s discriminatory laws,  UN experts say

GENEVA (1 April 2015) – Tanzania should take steps to revise or repeal  laws, customs and practices that discriminate against women, a UN Committee has said after considering the case of two widows who were prevented from inheriting their late husbands’ property and were left homeless.

The Geneva-based Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) issued its call  after considering a complaint by the women, who under local customary laws could not inherit upon their respective husband’s death and were subsequently evicted from their homes by their in-laws.

In 2005, the women, referred to as E.S and S.C, began legal proceedings, arguing that inheritance provisions be struck down because they contravened Tanzania’s Constitution and the country’s international obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, which it ratified in 1985.  They also argued that millions of other women in Tanzania experience the same violations they have faced as a result of discriminatory customary laws.

In 2006, the High Court agreed that the provisions were discriminatory but said it would not overturn them as doing so would “be opening a Pandora’s box, with all the seemingly discriminative customs from our 120 tribes plus following the same path”.

Customary law is in force in 30 districts, making it the most commonly applied form of law in Tanzania. Regarding widows, it states that she “has no share of the inheritance if the deceased left relatives of his clan; her share is to be cared for by her children, just as she cared for them.”

In its findings, the 23-member Committee said that Tanzania should grant the two women adequate reparation and compensation, noting that they had been left “economically vulnerable, with no property, no home to live in with their children and no form of financial support.”

CEDAW called on Tanzania to ensure that rights guaranteed under the Convention have precedence over inconsistent and discriminatory provisions. The Committee noted that States parties have an obligation to adopt measures to amend or abolish “not only existing laws and regulations, but also customs and practices that constitute discrimination against women.
” This includes countries such as Tanzania that have “multiple legal systems in which different personal status laws apply to individuals on the basis of identity factors such as ethnicity and religion”.

Courts should also refrain from resorting to unreasonable and undue delays, CEDAW said, noting that shortcomings in the Tanzanian judiciary had denied the women justice, with their appeal pending before the Court of Appeal for more than six years.

Among several other recommendations, CEDAW called on Tanzania to encourage dialogue on the removal of discriminatory law provisions and provide mandatory training for judges, prosecutors and other judicial personnel on the Convention and the Committee’s jurisprudence.

CEDAW said Tanzania should submit a written response within six months, including information on any action taken in light of its recommendations.

ENDS

*The Committee adopted its views on 2 March 2015 and published them on 1 April 2015: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CEDAW/Pages/JurisprudenceSession60.aspx
For more information and media requests, please contact Liz Throssell (+41 (0) 22 917 9466/ ethrossell@ohchr.org

More information on CEDAW:

Individual complaints process:

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:

Storify: http://storify.com/UNrightswire        

NEWS RELEASE - Zeid warns of total collapse in Yemen, calls for urgent protection of civilians



Zeid warns of total collapse in Yemen, calls for urgent protection of civilians
  
GENEVA (31 March 2015) - UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein on Tuesday expressed alarm about the fast deteriorating human rights situation in Yemen since 22 January when the legitimate Government under President Abd Rabbo Mansour Hadi was removed by force, provoking the recent military campaign by a coalition of ten countries lead by Saudi Arabia.

The High Commissioner called on all sides to protect civilians from harm, and to resolve their differences through dialogue rather than through the use of military force.

“The situation in Yemen is extremely alarming, with dozens of civilians killed over the past four days. The country seems to be on the verge of total collapse,” the High Commissioner said.

“I am shocked by Monday’s airstrike against the Al-Mazraq camp for internally displaced people in Harad, in the north of Yemen,” Zeid said. There are different accounts as to how many people were killed in the airstrike, but UN human rights staff in Yemen have verified at least 19 fatalities, with at least 35 others injured including 11 children. This camp, home to some 4,000 people, was established by the UN in 2009 and recently received at least 300 new families displaced from Sa'da.

In Dhale, the 33rd armoured division and Houthis-affiliated brigades reportedly attacked three hospitals, causing an unknown number of casualties.

"I roundly condemn all attacks on hospitals and other medical facilities, which have a special protected status under international law," Zeid said.

Heavy fighting has also been reported in the streets of Aden, resulting in casualties and making the humanitarian situation extremely difficult.

Since 27 March, at least 93 civilians have been killed and 364 injured in Sanaá, Sa'da, Dhale, Hudayda and Lahj.

“Private homes, hospitals, education facilities and infrastructure in several locations have been destroyed, making life even more difficult for the people in this war-torn country,” Zeid said. Civilian airports as well as electricity supplies have also been targeted by airstrikes in Sa’da, Sanaá and Hudayda.

Hundreds of people are reported to have fled their homes in Sana’a, Sa’sa and Dhale and are now displaced.

“The killing of so many innocent civilians is simply unacceptable,” the High Commissioner said. “The principles of proportionality, distinction, and precaution fully apply in this context. International human rights law and humanitarian law should be fully respected.”

ENDS

For further information and media requests, please contact Rupert Colville (+41 22 917 9767 /rcolville@ohchr.org)or Cécile Pouilly (+41 22 917 9310 / cpouilly@ohchr.org)

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:

MEDIA STATEMENT - For World Autism Awareness Day - Wednesday 2 April 2015 / Discr



For World Autism Awareness Day - Wednesday 2 April 2015

Discrimination against autistic persons, the rule rather than the exception – UN rights experts

GENEVA (30 March 2015) – Two United Nations human rights experts today  called for an end to discrimination against autistic persons and a celebration of diversity. Speaking ahead of World Autism Awareness Day, the Special Rapporteurs on the rights of persons with disabilities, Catalina Devandas Aguilar, and on the right to health, Dainius Pūras, noted that about one per cent of the world’s population -some 70 million people- is estimated to be on the autism spectrum worldwide.

“As part of human diversity, autistic persons should be embraced, celebrated and respected. However, discrimination against autistic children and adults is more the rule rather than the exception.

In many countries, autistic persons lack access to services which would support, on an equal basis with others, their right to health, education, employment, and living in the community. When available, services are too often far from human rights friendly or evidence-based.

Autistic persons are particularly exposed to professional approaches and medical practices which are unacceptable from a human rights point of view. Such practices – justified many times as treatment or protection measures – violate their basic rights, undermine their dignity, and go against scientific evidence.

Autistic children and adults face the proliferation of medicalized approaches relying on the over-prescription of psychotropic medications, their placement in psychiatric hospitals and long-term care institutions, the use of physical or chemical restraint, electro-impulsive therapy, etc. This may be particularly harmful and lead to the deterioration of their condition. All too often, such practices amount to ill-treatment or torture.

The autism spectrum should be understood from a broader perspective, including in research. We call for caution about enthusiastic attempts to find the causes of autism and ways to ‘cure’ autism through sophisticated but not necessarily ethical research. Autism as a condition is a critical challenge for modern health systems, in which we need to ensure that the practice and science of medicine is never again used to cause the suffering of people.

More investment is needed in services and research into removing societal barriers and misconceptions about autism. Autistics persons should be recognized as the main experts on autism and on their own needs, and funding should be allocated to peer-support projects run by and for autistic persons.

It is about providing individuals and families with the necessary skills and support to have choice and control over their lives. It is also about equal opportunities, access to inclusive education and mainstream employment to achieve equality and rights enjoyment by autistic persons. It is about promoting their independence and respecting their dignity.

Autistic persons should be respected, accepted and valued in our societies, and this can only be achieved by respecting, protecting and fulfilling their basic rights and freedoms.”

ENDS

Ms. Catalina Devandas Aguilar (Costa Rica) was designated as the first Special Rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities in December 2014 by the UN Human Rights Council. Ms. Devandas Aguilar has worked extensively on disability issues at the national, regional and international level with the Strategic Partnerships with the Disability Rights Advocacy Fund, the UN unit responsible for the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the World Bank. Her work has focused on the rights of women with disabilities and the rights of indigenous peoples with disabilities. Learn more, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Disability/SRDisabilities/Pages/SRDisabilitiesIndex.aspx

Mr. Dainius Pūras (Lithuania) was appointed as the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health by the UN Human Rights Council in June 2014. Mr Pûras is a Professor and the Head of the Centre for Child psychiatry social pediatrics at Vilnius University. He is also a human rights advocate who has been actively involved during the last 30 years in the process of transforming public health policies and services, with special focus on the rights of children, persons with mental disabilities, and other vulnerable groups. Learn more, visit: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Health/Pages/SRRightHealthIndex.aspx

The UN Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the ‘Special Procedures’ of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.

For more information and media requests, please contact Krista Orama (+41 22 928 9286 / korama@ohchr.org) or Dolores Infante-Cañibano (+ 41 22 917 9768 / dinfante@ohchr.org)

For media inquiries related to other UN independent experts:
Xabier Celaya, UN Human Rights – Media Unit (+ 41 22 917 9383 /   

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media: