Na ovom blogu će te moći pronaći vesti o Romima iz cele Evrope. Blog je napravljen kao pokretač osnivanja evropskih elektronskih novina na romskom jeziku “ Evropako romano lil “. Mada u elektronskom obliku, novine će izgledom i načinom čitanja podražavati štampane časopise. Na desnoj stranici će se nalaziti tekst na jeziku zemelje porekla teksta, a na levoj stranici prevod na romskom jeziku.
Translate
03. 06. 2018.
08. 03. 2018.
Accusations against UN expert a retaliation by Philippines, say fellow rapporteurs
Accusations against UN expert a retaliation by
Philippines, say fellow rapporteurs
GENEVA (8 March 2018) - UN human rights experts have
expressed grave concerns about terrorism accusations levelled against the UN
Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, Ms. Victoria
Tauli-Corpuz, a Philippine national.
The legal petition listing her name is an unacceptable
attack against the mandate holder by the Philippines Government, they added.
“We are shocked that the Special Rapporteur is being
targeted because of her work defending the rights of indigenous peoples,” said
Michel Forst, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights
defenders, and Catalina Devandas Aguilar, Chairperson of the Coordination
Committee of the Special Procedures.
The UN expert was named in a Government petition filed
last month in a Manila court, accused of terrorism and alleged membership of
the New People’s Army and the Communist Party of the Philippines along with
over 600 others.
“The accusation against her comes after the public
comments made, jointly with other Special Rapporteurs, in relation to the
militarization, attacks and killings of indigenous Lumad peoples by members of
the armed forces in Mindanao; this accusation is considered as an act of
retaliation for such comments,” the experts said.
The Special Rapporteur most recently addressed the issue
in a news release on 27 December 2017, which was made in line with the
responsibility entrusted to her by the Human Rights Council to report on
alleged violations of indigenous people’s rights globally. The President’s
spokesperson reacted with hostility to the news release, publicly accusing the
Special Rapporteur of seeking to embarrass the Duterte administration.
“We call on the Philippine authorities to immediately
drop these unfounded accusations against Ms. Tauli-Corpuz and to ensure her
physical safety and that of others listed,” the UN experts said.
“We remind the Philippine Government of its obligations
under the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations of
1946, which sets out that United Nations experts have immunity from legal
proceedings of every kind of spoken and written acts undertaken in the course
of their mandated work,” the experts added.
“The attack against the Special Rapporteur is taking
place in the context of widespread extrajudicial executions and ongoing attacks
against voices who are critical of the current Government, including human
rights defenders. The President has himself publicly intimidated Special
Rapporteurs.
“Ms. Tauli-Corpuz is a human rights defender,” the
experts said. “Therefore, the Government of the Philippines has a duty under
the Declaration on Human Rights Defenders to guarantee her right to promote and
to strive for the realization of human rights.”
ENDS
Mr. Michel Forst is Special Rapporteur on the situationof human rights defenders, and Ms. Catalina Devandas is Special Rapporteur onthe rights of persons with disabilities and Chairperson of the CoordinationCommittee of the Special Procedures.
The Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the
Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest
body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name
of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that
address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of
the world. Special Procedures experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not
UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from
any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.
For further information and media requests, please
contact: Adriana Zarraluqui (+41229179965/ azarraluqui@ohchr.org)
For media inquiries related to other UN independent
experts please contact:
Jeremy Laurence, UN Human Rights – Media Unit (+41 22 917
9383 / jlaurence@ohchr.org)
Udruženje novinara Roma
16. 02. 2018.
Turkey: Life sentences for journalists are “unprecedented assault on free speech”, say UN and OSCE experts

Turkey: Life sentences for journalists are “unprecedented
assault on free speech”, say UN and OSCE experts
GENEVA (16 February 2018) – Life sentences imposed on six
journalists today by a court in Turkey are an unparalleled attack on freedom of
expression and on the media, two international experts on media freedom have
said in a joint statement.
“These harsh sentences are an unacceptable and
unprecedented assault on freedom of expression and on the media in Turkey,”
said David Kaye, UN Special Rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion and
expression, and Harlem Désir, the Representative on Media Freedom for the
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE).
“These prison terms represent an unparalleled level of
suppression of dissenting voices in Turkey.
“We call on Turkey to reverse the decision and release
the journalists. Imprisonment for journalism not only silences the journalists,
but it also deprives Turkish citizens of their right to access pluralistic
views on issues that can directly affect their lives.”
Journalists Nazlı Ilıcak, Ahmet Altan, Mehmet Altan,
Fevzi Yazici, Yakup Simsek and Sukru Tugrul Ozsengul received life sentences at
the hearing in Istanbul, after being found guilty of taking part in the
unsuccessful coup attempt in 2016. They received additional 15-year terms for
allegedly committing crimes on behalf of the Gülen movement, which is
classified as a terrorist organization by Turkey.
“The court decision condemning journalists to life in
prison for their work, without presenting substantial proof of their
involvement in the coup attempt or ensuring a fair trial, critically threatens
journalism and with it the remnants of freedom of expression and media freedom
in Turkey,” said Mr. Kaye.
Mr. Désir said: “The magnitude of these punishments, and
the fact that the court failed to implement a Constitutional Court ruling
ordering Mr Altan’s release, raise fundamental questions about the ability of
the judiciary to uphold the constitutionally protected right to freedom of
expression.”
The Constitutional Court ruling, made on 11 January,
ordered that Mr. Altan and another journalist, Mr. Sahin Alpay, should be freed
from pre-trial detention on the grounds that their detention was
disproportionate and infringed their rights to liberty, freedom of expression
and freedom of the media.
The two experts described this binding ruling as a
landmark decision that could positively affect other trials of journalists.
However, lower courts have refused to implement it, saying the Constitutional
Court had exceeded its authority.
Mr. Kaye has previously submitted a third partyintervention to the European Court of Human Rights on the cases of 10 Turkish
journalists, including Mr. Alpay and three of the defendants jailed today.
END
Mr. David Kaye is the UN’s Special Rapporteur on thepromotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. The
Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the
Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent
experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s
independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific
country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special
Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not
receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization
and serve in their individual capacity.
As OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, Mr.
Harlem Désir
observes media developments in all 57 OSCE participating
States. He provides early warning on violations of freedom of expression and
media freedom and promotes full compliance with OSCE media freedom commitments.
Learn more on Twitter @OSCE_RFoM and Facebook.
For inquiries and media requests, please contact:
Azin Tadjdini (+41 22 917 9400 / atadjdini@ohchr.org).
For media inquiries related to other UN independent
experts please contact:
Jeremy Laurence – (+ 41 22 917 9826 /
jlaurence@ohchr.org)
This year, 2018, is the 70th anniversary of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the UN on 10 December 1948. The
Universal Declaration – translated into a world record 500 languages – is
rooted in the principle that “all human beings are born free and equal in
dignity and rights.” It remains relevant to everyone, every day. In honour of
the 70th anniversary of this extraordinarily influential document, and to
prevent its vital principles from being eroded, we are urging people everywhere
to Stand Up for Human Rights: www.standup4humanrights.org.
Udruženje novinara Roma
NEWS RELEASE - Planned US execution of seriously ill Doyle Hamm may amount to torture, UN experts warn

Planned US execution of seriously ill Doyle Hamm may
amount to torture, UN experts warn
GENEVA (16 February 2018) – Two UN human rights experts*
have called on the US Government to halt the execution of a seriously ill man
amid concerns that the use of a lethal injection could amount to cruel,
inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment, and possibly torture.
The Special Rapporteurs also expressed concern that Doyle
Hamm, who is due be executed in Alabama on 22 February, may not have received a
fair trial. Mr. Hamm was convicted of robbery and murder in 1987 and has been
on death row for more than three decades.
The execution is due to go ahead even though Mr. Hamm has
cancer and medical professionals have previously had difficulty accessing his
veins.
“We are seriously concerned that attempts to insert
needles into Mr. Hamm’s veins to carry out the lethal injection would inflict
pain and suffering that may amount to torture,” said the experts.
“The planned method of execution, using Alabama’s
three-drug protocol, may also have torturous effects, because the sedative used
is incapable of keeping a convict unconscious in the presence of the
excruciating pain likely to be induced by the other drugs.
“We urge the authorities to halt his execution, annul his
death sentence, and hold a re-trial that complies with international standards,
as we have received information indicating that his original trial did not
fully respect the most stringent due process and fair trial guarantees.”
The experts said that imposing the death penalty in a
manner that constitutes torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment would
render the execution arbitrary in nature and thus be in violation of the
fundamental right to life.
The experts have written to the US Government to express
their concerns about the case.
Judges have ordered a fresh medical report to be
delivered by 20 February, two days before the scheduled execution.
ENDS
*The experts: Ms Agnes Callamard, Special Rapporteur on
extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions and Mr. Nils Melzer, Special
Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment orpunishment.
The Special Rapporteurs and Working Groups are part of
what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. SpecialProcedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights
system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and
monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or
thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on
a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their
work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in
their individual capacity.
For more information and media requests, please contact:
Ms Rhiannon Painter (+41 22 917 9143 / rpainter@ohchr.org ) or write to
eje@ohchr.org.
This year, 2018, is the 70th anniversary of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the UN on 10 December 1948. The
Universal Declaration – translated into a world record 500 languages – is
rooted in the principle that “all human beings are born free and equal in
dignity and rights.” It remains relevant to everyone, every day. In honour of
the 70th anniversary of this extraordinarily influential document, and to
prevent its vital principles from being eroded, we are urging people everywhere
to Stand Up for Human Rights: www.standup4humanrights.org.
Udruženje novinara Roma
NEWS RELEASE - Zeid urges Iran to stop violating international law by executing juvenile offenders


Zeid urges Iran to stop violating international law by
executing juvenile offenders
GENEVA (16 February 2018) – Noting a surge in the number
of juvenile offenders being executed in Iran, the UN High Commissioner for
Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein on Friday urged Iran “to abide by
international law and immediately halt all executions of people sentenced to
death for crimes committed when they were under eighteen.”
Already, during the first month of 2018, three people –
two male and one female –have been executed for crimes they committed when they
were 15 or 16 years old. This compares to the execution of a total of five
juvenile offenders during the whole of 2017. A fourth juvenile offender, who
was believed to be on the point of being executed on Wednesday, has reportedly
received a temporary reprieve of two months. A number of other juvenile
offenders are also believed to be in danger of imminent execution in Iran, with
a total of some 80 such individuals reported to be currently on death row,
after being sentenced to death for crimes they committed when they were under
eighteen.
“The execution of juvenile offenders is unequivocally
prohibited under international law, regardless of the circumstances and nature
of the crime committed,” said Zeid. “The imposition of the death penalty on
people who committed crimes when they were under 18 is in clear violation of
Iran’s obligations under two international treaties that is has ratified and is
obliged to uphold – namely the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child*.”
“I am sad to say that Iran violates this absolute
prohibition under international human rights law far more often than any other
State,” he said. “No other State comes even remotely close to the total number
of juveniles who have been executed in Iran over the past couple of decades.”
The UN Human Rights Chief also noted that Iran ascribes
criminal responsibility to girls as young as nine years old, whereas boys are
not considered criminally responsible until they reach the age of 15**. He
described the discrepancy between the two genders as “wholly unjustifiable on
every level,” and the application of the death penalty to any person, female or
male, under 18 as “illegal and unacceptable.”
The three juvenile offenders subjected to the death
penalty in January were:
Mahboubeh Mofidi, who was 16 years old when, with the
help of her brother-in-law, she allegedly killed her husband, who had married
her when she was just 13 years old. She was 20 at the time of her execution on
30 January.
18-year-old Amir Hussein Pourjafar who allegedly raped
and murdered a young Afghan girl when he was 16;
22-year-old Ali Kazemi who was just 15 when he allegedly
committed murder.
The UN Human Rights Office is particularly concerned
about the fate of Abolfazl Chezani Sharahi, whose planned execution in Qom on
17 January was postponed for unknown
reasons (he is believed to have been scheduled for execution at least four
times in all for a crime allegedly committed when he was 15); and Hamid Hamadi,
whose trial is widely considered to have been grossly unfair, is also believed
to be at risk of execution at any moment for a crime allegedly committed when
he was 17. He is believed to have been scheduled for execution at least five
times.
Omid Rostami, whose scheduled execution along with 12
other people on Thursday in Karaj was postponed after the family of his alleged
victim agreed to pardon him in exchange for diyah or ‘blood money,’ is still at
risk if his family fails to raise the required funds within two months.
The High Commissioner noted that there had been some
partial improvements in relation to other aspects of the application of the
death penalty in Iran, most notably a bill amending the drug-trafficking law
that was approved by the Guardian Council in October 2017. As a result of this
amendment, some drug offences that were previously punishable by the death
penalty are now subject to a prison term, although the mandatory death sentence
is retained for a wide range of drug-related offences.
The amendment provides for retroactive applicability,
which means that all people currently on death row for drug-related offences
which are no longer punishable by the death penalty should see their sentence
commuted. The Deputy Head of the Justice Committee of the Parliament has stated
that about 5,300 inmates were on death row for drug crimes, and the High
Commissioner calls for the swift establishment of modalities for the review of
all cases of individuals sentenced to death under the drug-trafficking law, and
that the review should follow the principles of transparency, due process and
ensure effective legal representation of all those sentenced to death .
Successive High Commissioners for Human Rights have urged
Iran to stop all violations of international law relating to the death penalty,
in particular the absolute prohibition of the application of the death penalty
for juvenile offenders, and impose a moratorium on all executions with a view
to ending the use of the death penalty altogether.
ENDS
*ICCPR Article 6.5
Sentence of death shall not be imposed for crimes committed by persons
below eighteen years of age and shall not be carried out on pregnant women.
CRC Article
37: “States Parties shall ensure that:
(a) No child
shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment. Neither capital punishment nor life imprisonment without
possibility of release shall be imposed for offences committed by persons below
eighteen years of age;
**The minimum age of criminal responsibility in Iran is
nine lunar years for girls and 15 lunar years for boys, and the amended Islamic
Penal Code retains the death penalty for boys and girls who have attained these
ages.
For media requests, please contact Rupert Colville (+41
22 917 9767 / rcolville@ohchr.org) or Liz Throssell (+41 22 917 9466 /
ethrossell@ohchr.org).
2018 is the 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, adopted by the UN on 10 December 1948. The Universal
Declaration – translated into a world record 500 languages – is rooted in the
principle that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and
rights.” It remains relevant to everyone, every day. In honour of the
70thanniversary of this extraordinarily influential document, and to prevent
its vital principles from being eroded, we are urging people everywhere to
Stand Up for Human Rights: www.standup4humanrights.org.
Tag and share - Twitter: @UNHumanRights and Facebook:
unitednationshumanrights
Udruženje novinara Roma
NEWS RELEASE - African states affirm the rights of persons with disabilities in a new landmark Protocol

African states affirm the rights of persons with
disabilities in a new landmark Protocol
GENEVA (15 February 2018) - The newly adopted Protocol to
the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights has great potential to
strengthen the implementation of universal human rights for 84 million Africans
with disabilities, a UN human rights expert has said.
“I welcome the African Union’s historic adoption of a
Protocol that deals specifically with the rights of people with disabilities.
The hard work and leadership of people with disabilities across Africa had made
the milestone possible after nearly 20 years of preparation,” said Catalina
Devandas, the Special Rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities.
“This positive development should lead to considerable
improvements in the lives of African people with disabilities. The Protocol addresses
some of the urgent issues that have the most disproportionate impact on people
with disabilities, such as poverty, systemic discrimination and harmful
practices.
“The Protocol is expected to trigger a much greater
inclusion of the concerns of people with disabilities in laws, policies and
budgets, because it ensures increased accountability and closer oversight of
how States implement their human rights obligations,” the Special Rapporteur
added.
Ms. Devandas encouraged all 53 States which have already
signed up to the Charter to ratify the Protocol without delay. She also
reminded the African states of their responsibility to ensure protection and
promotion of the rights of persons with disabilities in conformity with the
standards of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
“The Protocol, builds on the Convention, for example by
explicitly recognizing people’s rights to exercise legal capacity and by
providing protection against any interference with such capacity – a right set
out in my recent report to the Human Rights Council,” the Special Rapporteur
said.
The adoption of the Protocol, which took place at the
African Union Summit in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, on 29 January, is the
culmination of a process that began in 1999 with the declaration of the African
Decade for Persons with Disabilities and the creation of an ad hoc WorkingGroup.
ENDS
Ms. Catalina Devandas (Costa Rica) was designated as the
first Special Rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities in June
2014 by the UN Human Rights Council. Ms. Devandas has worked extensively on
disability issues at the national, regional and international level with the
Disability Rights Advocacy Fund, the UN unit responsible for the Convention on
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the World Bank. Her work has
focused on the rights of women with disabilities and the rights of indigenous
peoples with disabilities.
The Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the
Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest
body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name
of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that
address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of
the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not
UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from
any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.
For more information and media requests, please contact:
Alina Grigoras (+41 22 91 79289 / agrigoras@ohchr.org) or Cristina Michels (+41
22 928 98 66 / cmichels@ohchr.org) or write to sr.disability@ohchr.org
For media inquiries related to other UN independent
experts please contact
Jeremy Laurence, UN Human Rights – Media Unit (+41 22 917
9383 / jlaurence@ohchr.org)
This year, 2018, is the 70th anniversary of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the UN on 10 December 1948. The
Universal Declaration – translated into a world record 500 languages – is
rooted in the principle that “all human beings are born free and equal in
dignity and rights.” It remains relevant to everyone, every day. In honour of
the 70th anniversary of this extraordinarily influential document, and to
prevent its vital principles from being eroded, we are urging people everywhere
to Stand Up for Human Rights: www.standup4humanrights.org.
Udruženje novinara Roma
NEWS RELEASE - US urged to protect rights defenders as activist Maru Mora Villalpando faces deportation case


US urged to protect rights defenders as activist Maru Mora Villalpando faces deportation case
GENEVA (14 February 2018) – The United States Government
must respect the rights of human rights defenders, a group of UN experts* has
said, amid concern over action being taken against a Mexican woman who
campaigns to protect migrants’ rights.
Maru Mora Villalpando, who has been in the US since 1996,
is facing deportation proceedings after fronting a high-profile campaign
against alleged human rights violations at a US immigrants’ detention centre,
operated by a private company on behalf of the US Government.
“Ms. Villalpando’s notice to appear at deportation
proceedings, received without warning, seems to be related to her advocacy work
on behalf of migrant detainees,” the experts said.
“We urge the US Government to protect and ensure Ms.
Villalpando’s rights as a defender and her right to family life.
“The authorities should take all necessary measures to
guarantee that no action, including detention and deportation, as means of
retaliation, is taken against Ms. Villalpando for reporting cases of the detention
of immigrants and alleged violations of their human rights, especially in view
of the reported conditions in these centres of detention.”
The experts said they were concerned that Ms.
Villalpando’s case appeared to be part of a pattern.
“Giving people notice of deportation proceedings appears
to be a part of an increasing pattern of intimidation and retaliation against
people defending migrants’ rights in the US,” the experts said.
“People working legitimately to protect migrants’ rights
must not be restricted or silenced. Their rights must be upheld so they can
continue to exercise their vital role.”
Ms. Villalpando, whose 20-year-old daughter is a US
citizen, is co-founder of a group which highlights human rights concerns about
the Northwest Detention Centre in Tacoma, Washington.
She has raised the issue with the UN Working Group on
Arbitrary Detention and with the Inter-American Commission for Human Rights,
alleging corporate involvement in human rights violations as well as expressing
concern over hunger strikes and the deportation of migrants.
The experts also stressed the need for the centre to meet
international human rights standards and for the Government to exercise proper
oversight of the privatized facility.
The UN experts have been in contact with the Government regarding
their concerns.
ENDS
*The UN experts: Ms. Elina Steinerte, Vice-Chair on
Communications of the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; Mr. Felipe
González Morales, Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants; Mr.
Michel Forst, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders;
Ms. Anita Ramasastry, Chair person of UN Working Group on human rights and
transnational corporations and other business enterprises
The Special Rapporteurs and Working Groups are part of
what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special
Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights
system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and
monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or
thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on
a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their
work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in
their individual capacity.
UN Human Rights country page: USA
For more information and media requests, please contact:
Lucie Viersma (+41 22 928 9380 / lviersma@ohchr.org)
For media inquiries related to other UN independent
experts please contact
Jeremy Laurence, UN Human Rights – Media Unit (+41 22 917
9383 / jlaurence@ohchr.org)
This year, 2018, is the 70th anniversary of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the UN on 10 December 1948. The
Universal Declaration – translated into a world record 500 languages – is
rooted in the principle that “all human beings are born free and equal in
dignity and rights.” It remains relevant to everyone, every day. In honour of
the 70th anniversary of this extraordinarily influential document, and to
prevent its vital principles from being eroded, we are urging people everywhere
to Stand Up for Human Rights: www.standup4humanrights.org.
Udruženje novinara Roma
Pretplati se na:
Postovi (Atom)




















