Translate

24. 04. 2015.

MEDIA STATEMENT: Joint Statement on Mediterranean Crossings



Joint Statement on Mediterranean Crossings

UN High Commissioner for Refugees António Guterres, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein, Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for International Migration and Development Peter Sutherland, and Director-General of the International Organization for Migration                                    William Lacy Swing

A tragedy of epic proportions is unfolding in the Mediterranean. We, the undersigned*, strongly urge European leaders to put human life, rights, and dignity first today when agreeing upon a common response to the humanitarian crisis in the Mediterranean.

The European Union is founded on the fundamental principles of humanity, solidarity and respect for human rights. We urge EU Member States to demonstrate moral and political leadership in adopting a holistic and forward-looking action plan centred upon these values.

The European Union response needs to go beyond the present minimalist approach in the 10 Point Plan on Migration, announced by the EU on Monday, which focuses primarily on stemming the arrival of migrants and refugees on its shores. As a paramount principle, the safety, protection needs, and human rights of all migrants and refugees should be at the forefront of the EU response. 

EU leaders must look beyond the present situation and work closely with transit and origin countries both to alleviate the immediate plight of migrants and refugees and address in a more comprehensive way the many factors that drive them to resort to such desperate journeys by sea. 

Enforcement alone will not solve the issue of irregular migration, but could increase the risks and abuse faced by migrants and refugees.
We would therefore encourage bold, collective action to expand the range of measures under consideration to include:

  • Setting in place a State-led, robust, proactive, and well-resourced search-and-rescue operation, urgently and without delay, with a capacity similar to Mare Nostrum and a clear mission to save lives.


  • Creating sufficient channels for safe and regular migration, including for low-skilled migrant workers and individuals in need of family reunification, and access to protection where needed, as safe alternatives to resorting to smugglers.
  • Making a firm commitment to receive significantly higher numbers of refugees through EU-wide resettlement, in addition to current quotas, and on a scale which will make a real impact, combined with other legal means for refugees to reach safety.
  • Bolstering arrangements to support those countries receiving the most arrivals (Italy, Malta, and Greece) and to distribute responsibility more equitably across the European Union for saving lives and protecting all those in need.
  • Combatting racist and xenophobic rhetoric vilifying migrants and refugees.

*
António Guterres, UN High Commissioner for Refugees
Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
Peter Sutherland, Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for International Migration and Development
William L. Swing, Director-General of the International Organization for Migration


Media Contacts

UNHCR
GENEVA
Adrian Edwards, UNHCR Spokesman, edwards@unhcr.org +41 79 557 9120
William Spindler, UNHCR Senior Comms Officer, spindler@unhcr.org +41 79 217 30 11

PARIS
Philippe Leclerc, UNHCR Paris Representative, Leclerc@unhcr.org +33 1 44 43 48 50

LONDON
Andrej Mahecic, UNHCR UK Spokesperson, Mahecic@unhcr.org +44 78 802 30 985

WASHINGTON DC
Brian Hansford, UNHCR US Spokesperson, Hansford@unhcr.org +1 202 999 8253

ROME
Carlotta Sami, UNHCR Southern Europe Spokesperson, Sami@unhcr.org +39 335 679 4746

IOM MEDIA CONTACT
Joel Millman jmillman@iom.int, +41 79 103 8720

OHCHR MEDIA CONTACT
Rupert Colville rcolville@ohchr.org, +41 22 917 9767

Senior Advisor to SRSG Sutherland
Gregory Maniatis gmaniatis@gmail.com +1 917 609 8777

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:

21. 04. 2015.

NEWS RELEASE - Pakistan: UN human rights experts welcome Supreme Court ruling on death pen



Pakistan: UN human rights experts welcome Supreme Court ruling on death penalty

GENEVA (21 April 2015) – A group of United Nations independent experts* welcomed today the recent decision by the Supreme Court of Pakistan to suspend death sentences imposed by military courts.
“We had expressed our concerns at the decision of Pakistan to rescind the unofficial six-year moratorium on death penalty for non-military personnel in terrorism-related cases,” the independent experts noted.
“Terrorism attacks should not prevent States from complying with the stringent requirements of international law for the imposition of the death penalty,” they reiterated.
International law requires that the death penalty may be imposed only in the context of a stringent functioning of the law and order system, so as to ensure the highest respect of due process and fair trial guarantees for the defendants. “Only full respect of these guarantees distinguishes capital punishment as possibly permitted under international law from an arbitrary execution,” the experts stressed.
“The administration of justice through military tribunals raises serious questions, particularly in terms of access to justice, independence and impartiality of the court, and respect for the fair trial rights of the accused,” noted the UN independent experts.
“Using military tribunals to try civilians in the name of national security, a state of emergency or counter-terrorism, runs against all relevant international and regional human rights standards and established case law.”

“Military tribunals should have jurisdiction only over military personnel who commit military offences or breaches of military discipline, and then only when those offences or breaches do not amount to serious human rights violations, and they should never have the power to impose the death penalty,” the experts further noted.
“We have repeatedly called on all States to assess whether the use of the death penalty is compatible with the right to life, as well as the inherent dignity of the human person, causes severe mental and physical pain or suffering and constitutes a violation, inter alia, of the absolute prohibition of torture,” the experts stated.
“We hope that the decision of the Supreme Court will provide an opportunity for all relevant actors in Pakistan to pursue a critically important dialogue aiming to address the questions relating to the legality of military tribunals, and the use of the death penalty, in line with Pakistan’s international human rights obligations.”
To this end, the experts stressed that ensuring a safe environment for judges, prosecutors, lawyers and other members of the justice system is of fundamental importance.

(*) The experts:  Ben Emmerson, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism; Juan Méndez, Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; Christof Heyns, Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; Mads Andenas, Chair-Rapporteur of the Working Group on arbitrary detention; Gabriela Knaul, Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers; and Ariel Dulitzky, Chair of the Working Group on enforced or involuntary disappearance.

ENDS

The Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity. Learn more, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/SP/Pages/Welcomepage.aspx
For more information and media requests please contact Alessandro Marra (+41 22 928 9870 / amarra@ohchr.org) or write to srct@ohchr.org.

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/UNOH

19. 04. 2015.

NEWS RELEASE - UN Assistant Secretary-General for Human Rights condemns suicide attack durin



UN Assistant Secretary-General for Human Rights condemns suicide attack during visit to Jalalabad

NEW YORK/KABUL/GENEVA (18April 2015) – “I strongly condemn the brutal suicide attack that coincided with my visit to Jalalabad today,” said United Nations Assistant Secretary-General for Human Rights Ivan Šimonović during his visit to Afghanistan. The suicide attack targeted people queuing outside a bank in central Jalalabad, including Government employees and security forces personnel collecting their salaries.  At least 35 people were reportedly killed and more than 100 people injured, including children. The attack was accompanied by other Improvised Explosive Devices that were planted in city.

“Immediately after theattack, I met the Acting Governor, local police chief and military commander and expressed the United Nations’ deep condolences to the victims and families affected,” Šimonović said. “I not only condemn this terrible attack, but the indiscriminate tactic it represents, which is exacting such an unacceptable toll on Afghan civilians.”

While in Jalalabad, the Assistant-Secretary General met with local Government officials, civil society actors and women’s groups.

“The use of suicide bombs and other devices in such an indiscriminate way by insurgent groups clearly constitutes a war crime, and those responsible for organising or perpetrating such attacks must be brought to justice,” Šimonović said.

The UN Assistance Mission inAfghanistan released its latest annual report on trends in civilian casualties in January.  The report highlighteda 22 per cent increase in civilian casualties in Afghanistan during 2014, and these high levels have continued in the first months of 2015.

ENDS

Ivan Šimonovićassumed his functions as UN Assistant Secretary-General for Human Rights on 17 July 2010. He heads the New York Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.

For more details please contact:
For possible interviews directly in Afghanistan today: +1 917 288 7560
In Geneva: Ravina Shamdasani, rshamdasani@ohchr.org, +41 79 201 0115

In New York: Nenad Vasic, vasic@un.org, +1 917 941 7558

18. 04. 2015.

[Roma_Francais] Opinion: Political Bodies


Roma Virtual Network' romale0804@yahoo.com [Roma_Francais]

Political Bodies
By Qristina Zavačková

16/04/2015 - I’m not a well-known Romani figure and I’m not particularly well-educated, but with news this month of a new Romani initiative – the European Roma Institute – I’ve come to understand something: I am not just Romani (Roma, Roma Gypsy, Gypsy); I am an embodiment of all that needs fixed within Europe; I am a political statement. It has also become clear, from the commentary surrounding this news, that I – as a self-identified Romani – have no right to any say at all and certainly no ability to have any input in what needs done to fix my situation. Only when Romani step into the political spotlight do non-Romani swarm forward to protect their own interests – i.e: the intertwined domains of education and politics. In fact, the most vocal opposition I’ve read thus far has come on one hand from academia and on the other from ex-European Parliamentary members. If I am educated, vocal, and visible, I am a self-identified Romani, as though my ethnicity is suddenly some kind of choice. (However, if I am poor, uneducated, and living in a ghetto my ethnicity is not questioned. It is handed to me, in words not of my choosing).

My grandmother was a Gypsy all her life. She was a stereotype – poor and illiterate. She was handed her ethnicity as she ran for her life from the S.S. Einsatzgruppen, it was not a choice she made. She told me once that non-Roma kept us from education and jobs because they were scared that they had misjudged us and that they would have to admit we weren’t like rats, but instead like people. As she said, “then they must eat shame for generation after generation”. My uncle always said that there were only two options for us: live, act, and speak like non-Roma or live our lives, but in poverty, fear, and silence. Facets of our ethnicity are prescribed daily – we are real Romani only if we do this or that, or live this way or that way, or speak this dialect or that one. Academics paint us into corners as statistics, genetic haplotypes, and linguistically intriguing anomalies, literary authors use their pastel-tinted brushes to describe our pastoral, wandering, romantic life, edged with razor-sharp undercurrents of thieves, vagabonds, miscreants, danger danger danger! News outlets call us gypsies and imply we are invading and stealing and breaking England and France and Ireland and Canada.

Although we are not indigenous and don’t have our own country, we are, nevertheless, a colonized people. All aspects of our being is regulated and isolated. Non-Roma are still trying to civilize us – in fact, the production of knowledge about Romani sits firmly in non-Romani hands – despite claims to the contrary, many of these academics and authors reflect and reinforce colonial ideology, which in turn becomes a mode of exercising authority over us by organizing and classifying knowledge about us. This is unsurprising really, since “knowledge” is simply a reflection of economic or political interests. [However, it’s interesting to note one of the most vociferous voices in this debate is a non-Romani academic afraid of Romani intrusion into his sphere of influence].

A Romani Institute is not going to fix any of this and may, in fact, make everything more difficult. A Romani Institute isn’t going to give me a voice, give me a place in academia, or silence those non-Roma who like to criticize us no matter what we do. It isn’t going to fix the rifts between our own families, clans, and groups. It isn’t going to help Sinti, Travellers, Jenische, Manouche, Gens du Voyage or anyone else who doesn’t self-identify as Romani. It isn’t going to give us jobs, provide outstanding education, healthcare, or social welfare. It isn’t going to solve our human rights issues, disband the Jobbik party, or desegregate eduction.

In fact, I doubt that the ERI will do a single thing for me or my family in Europe. But, I am behind this initiative one hundred thousand percent.

Too many initiatives have been created, whether by Romani or for Romani, without an understanding of what Romani really want and need. Perhaps this will be no different, but if the wood won’t burn, it’s most likely wet and you may as well try a different branch. Some argue that other initiatives already exist – but what have they done? What are they doing? From my uneducated, naive perspective I have seen little change.

That’s just it, I suppose. What in these initiatives will actually help people like me to be involved? What is there for us self-identified Romani academics and authors? The ERI proposal at least sounds like it could force open a space for discourse and empower small voices to rise up.

I think that’s exactly what non-Romani are afraid of – the successful transfer of knowledge and power into Romani hands – in essence, a move to decolonize our own voices and spaces, to politicize our own bodies.

But, what do I know?

ko kamel ča te sikhavel, bisterel te sikhljol.


[Roma_Francais] Suspects appear in French court for allegedly selling Roma babies in 2013


Roma Virtual Network' romale0804@yahoo.com [Roma_Francais] Suspects

Suspects appear in French court for allegedly selling Roma babies in 2013

Four Romanians are to appear this week in court in Marseille on suspicions of involvement in a baby trafficking network. They face up to 10 years in prison.

07/04/2015 - According to the prosecution, they were thought to have acted as intermediaries between childless couples and people from the Roma community.

The case began in July 2013 when a newborn boy was allegedly sold in a Marseille hospital for 8,000 euros and a used car.

Investigators later traced the biological mother – a Roma mother of five – after the hospital reported that a couple had stayed two days at her bedside before she left hospital without her newborn.

The adoptive parents could face up to two years in prison and a 30,000-euro fine.

Police officers assume that a family network of baby trafficking has operated in south-east France and Corsica.


COMMUNIQUÉ DE PRESSE (FRANCAIS/ENGLISH)- Femmes au Sénégal: Briser les chaînes du silenc



La version anglaise se trouve ci-dessous
English version, see below

Femmes au Sénégal: Briser les chaînes du silence et des inégalités

DAKAR/GENEVE  (17 avril 2015) – Il est temps de briser les obstacles socio-culturels qui empêchent les femmes sénégalaises de pleinement réaliser leurs droits, a déclaré la Présidente du Groupe de Travail de l’ONU sur la question de la discrimination contre les femmes dans la législation et dans la pratique, Emna Aouij, au terme d’une visite de dix jours dans le pays.

L’experte de l’ONU a souligné que des progrès notoires ont été réalisés au Sénégal, qu’il s’agisse du cadre légal et institutionnel ou des nombreuses politiques et activités visant à promouvoir et protéger les droits des femmes. Toutefois de fortes contraintes d’ordre socio-culturel et juridique continuent à faire obstacle à la réalisation de l’égalité des genres. 

« Il est inadmissible que sous le prétexte de la tradition, des coutumes ou encore de la pauvreté, des filles et des femmes voient leurs droits fondamentaux bafoués, soient violentées, abusées et vivent dans des conditions indignes », a-t-elle poursuivi.

Mme Aouij a ainsi insisté sur la nécessité de modifier certaines dispositions légales, en particulier celles stipulant la puissance maritale et paternelle dans le Code de la famille sénégalais.

« Je suis particulièrement alarmée par l’échelle des violences faites aux femmes, perpétuées par des attitudes et valeurs patriarcales conservatrices», a déclaré Mme Aouij. « Tous les interlocuteurs que j’ai rencontrés lors de ma visite ont souligné le nombre effarant de viols, d’incestes, de harcèlement sexuel et de violence domestique. Il s’agit là d’un problème grave et généralisé qui requiert des mesures urgentes à tous les niveaux.»

L’experte a par ailleurs souligné que, malgré l’absence de barrière formelle  pour la pleine participation des femmes à la vie économique du pays, dans la pratique, de nombreux obstacles se posent. Plus de 80% des femmes actives travaillent dans le secteur informel, ne bénéficiant donc pas des services sociaux de base et travaillant souvent de longues heures dans des conditions insalubres et parfois dangereuses. Mme Aouij s’est aussi inquiétée de l’accès à la terre très limité des femmes et ce bien qu’elles assurent l’immense majorité de la production agricole.

L’experte s’est félicitée que le Sénégal ait atteint la parité de genre dans l’accès à l’éducation primaire et un taux brut de scolarisation des filles de 98%. Elle a toutefois souligné que les abandons scolaires restaient beaucoup plus élevés chez les filles. « Les travaux domestiques, les abus sexuels en milieu scolaire,  les mariages et les grossesses précoces sont autant de facteurs d’échec scolaire », a expliqué l’experte.

Mme Aouij a par ailleurs souligné les progrès considérables réalisés par Sénégal en termes de participation des femmes à la vie politique, notamment grâce à la loi sur la Parité de 2010. Le pays se trouve ainsi au 7ème rang mondial quant au nombre de femmes parlementaires. Les élections locales de 2014 ont toutefois montré que la marginalisation politique des femmes n’est toujours pas complètement résolue. Le pays ne compte ainsi que 13 femmes maires sur un total de 557 communes.

« Il reste beaucoup à accomplir pour que les femmes sénégalaises puissent pleinement bénéficier de leur droit à la santé », a par ailleurs souligné l’experte. Parmi les nombreux problèmes rencontrés figurent: (i) les mauvaises conditions d’hygiène, les contraintes d’accès à l’eau et surtout à l’eau potable; (ii) le manque d’information et de maîtrise de leurs droits et santé sexuels et reproductifs entraînant des grossesses à un âge précoce; (iii) un taux de prévalence du VIH/Sida beaucoup plus élevé chez les femmes; (v) des pratiques et coutumes préjudiciables telles que les mutilations génitales (un quart des femmes de 15 à 49 ans ont déclaré en avoir été victimes).

Le Sénégal a par ailleurs l’une des lois sur l’avortement les plus restrictives d’Afrique et qui pénalise surtout les femmes en situation de précarité socio-économique. Le Groupe de Travail soutient fortement le projet de loi en cours visant à élargir l’avortement médicalisé aux cas de viols et d’inceste. 

« Pour briser les chaînes du silence et de l’inégalité, les femmes sénégalaises doivent obtenir une plus grande autonomie, être dûment formées et informées, mener des activités économiques leur assurant un développement économique durable et pouvoir accéder à la justice, sans discrimination aucune », a conclu Mme Aouij.

Au cours de cette visite officielle qui s’est déroulée du 7 au 17 avril, la Présidente du Groupe de Travail s’est rendue à Dakar, Yeumbeul, Pikine, Kaolack, Diourbel, Fandène et Thiès.

Les conclusions et recommandations de cette visite seront développées dans un rapport qui sera présenté au Conseil des droits de l’homme en juin 2016. 

FIN


Le Groupe de travail des Nations Unies sur la question de la discrimination contre les femmes en droit et dans la pratique a été créé par le Conseil de droits de l’homme en 2011 pour identifier, de promouvoir et d’échanger des vues, en consultation avec les États et les autres acteurs, sur les bonnes pratiques liées à l’élimination des lois que la discrimination contre les femmes. Le Groupe est également chargé de développer un dialogue avec les États et les autres acteurs sur les lois qui ont un effet discriminatoire en ce qui concerne les femmes.

Le Groupe de Travail est composé de cinq expertes indépendantes. La Présidente-Rapporteur est Emna Aouij (Tunisie), la Vice-Présidente Rapporteur est Eleonora Zielinska (Pologne) et les autres membres sont Mme Kamala Chandrakirana (Indonésie), Mme Alda Facio (Costa Rica) et Mme Frances Raday (Israël/Royaume-Uni). Pour plus d’information, connectez-vous sur :  http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Women/WGWomen/Pages/WGWomenIndex.aspx   

Les experts indépendants font partie de ce qui est désigné sous le nom des procédures spéciales du Conseil des droits de l’homme. Les procédures spéciales, l’organe le plus important d’experts indépendants du Système des droits de l’homme de l’ONU, est le terme général appliqué aux mécanismes d’enquête et de suivi indépendants du Conseil qui s’adressent aux situations spécifiques des pays ou aux questions thématiques partout dans le monde. Les experts des procédures spéciales travaillent à titre bénévole; ils ne font pas partie du personnel de l’ONU et ils ne reçoivent pas de salaire pour leur travail. Ils sont indépendants des gouvernements et des organisations et ils exercent leurs fonctions à titre indépendant. 


Pour toute question complémentaire et  demandes de presse , veuillez contacter:
À Dakar  : Caroline Ouaffo Wafang (+221 77 740 05 09/  couaffowafang@ohchr.org )
À Genève  : Bernadette Arditi (+41 22 917 9159 / mobile : +41 79 444 4078 /   barditi@ohchr.org )

ONU Droits de l’homme, suivez-nous sur les réseaux sociaux :   

Consultez l’Index universel des droits de l’homme :  http://uhri.ohchr.org/fr


NEWS RELEASE
Women in Senegal: Breaking the chains of silence and inequality

DAKAR/GENEVA (17 April 2015) – It is time to break socio-cultural barriers that prevent Senegalese women to fully realise their rights, said the Chairperson of the UN Working Group on the issue of discrimination against women in law and in practice, Emna Aouij, at the end of a ten-day visit to the country.

The UN expert stressed that significant progress has been achieved in Senegal, whether in terms of the legal and institutional framework or the many policies and activities aiming to promote and protect women’s rights. However, strong socio-cultural and legal constraints continue to stand in the way of the achievement of gender equality.

“It is unacceptable that under the guise of tradition, customs or poverty, girls and women have their basic rights violated, are assaulted, abused and live in unworthy conditions”, she continued.

Ms. Aouij insisted on the need to amend certain legal provisions, particularly those stipulating the marital and paternal authority in the Senegalese family code.

“I am particularly alarmed at the level of violence against women, perpetuated by patriarchal attitudes and conservative values”, Ms. Aouij said. “All the stakeholders that I met during my visit stressed the alarming number of rapes, incest, sexual harassment and domestic violence. This is a serious and widespread problem that requires urgent action at all levels”.

The expert also pointed out that, despite the absence of formal barriers to the full participation of women in the economic life of the country, in practice, there are many obstacles. Over 80% of active women work in the informal sector, not benefiting from basic social services and often working long hours in substandard and even dangerous conditions. Ms. Aouij was also concerned of the very limited access to land for women and this even though they provide the vast majority of agricultural production.

The expert was pleased to know that Senegal has achieved gender equality in access to primary education and a gross enrolment rate for girls of 98%. However, she highlighted that dropouts remained much higher among girls. “Domestic work, sexual abuse in schools, early marriages and early pregnancies are factors of school failure”, said the expert.

Ms. Aouij also stressed the considerable progress made by Senegal in terms of women's participation in political life, particularly through the 2010 Law on Parity. The country is now ranking 7 th in the world in terms of number of parliamentarian women. However, the 2014 local elections showed that the political marginalisation of women is still not fully resolved. The country only has 13 women mayor out of a total of 557 municipalities.

“Much remains to be done so that Senegalese women can fully enjoy their right to health”, also stressed the expert. Among the many problems encountered are: (i) poor hygienic conditions, constraints to access to water and especially drinking water; (ii) lack of information and lack of control over their sexual and reproductive rights and health resulting in pregnancies at an early age; (iii) a prevalence rate of HIV/AIDS much higher among women; (iv) harmful practices and traditions such as female genital mutilations (a quarter of women aged between 15 and 49 reported having been victim of these practices).

Senegal has also one of the most restrictive abortion laws in Africa and which penalizes particularly women in precarious socio-economic situations. The Working Group strongly supports the current bill aiming to expand therapeutic abortion in cases of rape and incest.

“To break the chains of silence and inequality, Senegalese women need to have more autonomy, to be properly trained and informed, to conduct economic activities ensuring their sustainable economic development and to access justice without discrimination”, concluded Ms. Aouij.

During this official visit, which took place from 7 to 17 April, the Chairperson of the Working Group visited Dakar, Yeumbeul, Pikine, Kaolack, Diourbel, Fandène and Thiès.

The conclusions and recommendations of this visit will be developed in a report that will be presented to the Human Rights Council in June 2016.

ENDS

The UN Working Group on the issue of discrimination against women in law and in practice was created by the Human Rights Council in 2011 to identify, promote and exchange views, in consultation with States and other actors, on good practices related to the elimination of laws that discriminate against women. The Group is also tasked with developing a dialogue with States and other actors on laws that have a discriminatory impact where women are concerned.

The Working Group is composed of five independent experts: the Current Chair-Rapporteur is Ms.  Emna Aouij  (Tunisia), Vice-President: Ms.  Eleonora Zielinska  (Poland), Ms.  Kamala Chandrakirana  (Indonesia), Ms.  Alda Facio  (Costa Rica) and Ms.  Frances Raday  (Israel/United Kingdom). Learn more, log on to:   http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Women/WGWomen/Pages/WGWomenIndex.aspx 

The independent experts are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.

UN Human Rights, country page – Senegal:  http://www.ohchr.org/EN/countries/AfricaRegion/Pages/SNIndex.aspx 

For inquiries and  media requests , please contact:
In Dakar : Caroline Ouaffo Wafang (+221 77 740 05 09/  couaffowafang@ohchr.org )
In Geneva : Bernadette Arditi (+41 22 917 9159 / mobile: +41 79 444 4078 /    barditi@ohchr.org )

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:

NEWS RELEASE - UN disability rights committee publishes concluding observations on Germany,



Committee on Rights of Persons with Disabilities publishes findings on
Germany, Croatia, Czech Republic, Turkmenistan, Dominican Republic,
Mongolia and Cook Islands

GENEVA (17 April 2015) – The UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has published its findings on the countries it examined during its latest session from 25 March to 17 April: Germany, Croatia, Czech Republic, Turkmenistan, Dominican Republic, Mongolia and Cook Islands.
The findings, officially termed concluding observations, contain positive aspects of the respective State’s implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and also main matters of concern and recommendations.

During its March-April session, the Committee also held a day-long discussion on the right to inclusive education for people disabilities. The meeting in Geneva on 15 May brought together leading experts, and representatives of government, UN agencies, national human rights institutions, and NGOs, including disabled persons’ organisations.

The Committee will use the outcome of this discussion as part of its work on a General Comment, which is an authoritative commentary, on the right to education as set out in Article 24* of the Convention. 

ENDS

For more information and media requests, please contact:  Liz Throssell ethrossell@ohchr.org / 41 22 917 9466 / 41 79 752 0488

More information on the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities:
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRPD/Pages/CRPDIndex.aspx

Article 24: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRPD/Pages/ConventionRightsPersonsWithDisabilities.aspx#24

OHCHR PRESS BRIEFING NOTE - Ukraine


17 April 2015
Spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights: Ravina Shamdasani
Location:        Geneva
Subject:        Ukraine

We are increasingly worried that the dire human rights situation in areas of the east of Ukraine is likely to deteriorate further as a result of breaches in the ceasefire. There are reports of intensification of fighting, especially in the vicinity of the Donetsk airport and near the village of Shyrokine in the Donetsk region, where heavy weapons, including mortars, artillery and tanks are reportedly extensively used - in violation of provisions of the Minsk Agreement.

In one day alone, on 13 April, the Ukrainian armed forces reported six servicemen killed and 12 wounded, while the self-proclaimed ‘Donetsk people’s republic’ and self-proclaimed ‘Luhansk people’s republic’ claimed four of their fighters were killed and 17 wounded. We fear a further escalation of hostilities.

Since April 2014, at least 6,116 people, both military personnel and civilians, have been killed* and 15,474 wounded. These figures are estimates, up to 14 April 2015, and the actual number of casualties could be considerably higher. Hundreds of people remain missing and hundreds of bodies are still pending recovery and/or identification.

Civilians continue to suffer seriously as a result of the protracted conflict. So far, in 2015 alone, about 400 civilians have been killed as a result of indiscriminate shelling of residential areas and because of landmines and unexploded ordnance – both in Government-controlled territories and in territories controlled by armed groups.

The killings in Kyiv of a former parliamentarian, Oleh Kalashnikov, and of two journalists, Oles Buzyna and Serhiy Sukhobok, are also very disturbing and must result in a swift, independent and credible investigation shedding light on these crimes and ensuring justice and accountability for those responsible.

The protection of civilians must be considered the utmost priority and those committing violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, in any part of the country and by any side to the conflict, must be held accountable.

The conflict also continues to severely affect the daily life of the population, both in conflict-affected zones and in the rest of Ukraine. The proliferation of arms, the lack of job opportunities, limited access to medical and psychological rehabilitation, particularly for more than 20,000 demobilised soldiers, and a deep anxiety that the ceasefire may not hold all have a serious impact on the population.

We urge all parties to comply at all times with international humanitarian law and human rights law and respect the provisions contained in the Minsk Agreement.
ENDS

* The casualty figures are estimated by the UN Human Rights Office and the World Health Organisation.


For more information, please contact Ravina Shamdasani (+41 22 917 9169 / rshamdasani@ohchr.org).

MEDIA ADVISORY: The right to challenge lawfulness of detention – UN expert group



The right to challenge lawfulness of detention – UN expert group to adopt new guidelines

GENEVA (16 April 2015) – The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention* will adopt its Basic Principles and Guidelines on the right of anyone deprived of liberty to challenge the lawfulness of his or her detention before court. The new guidelines will be approved in Geneva during the Group’s 72nd session (20-29 April).  

“The right to have the detention reviewed in court without delay is a central element of everyone’s right to liberty and security,” said human rights expert Mads Andenas, who currently heads the five-member body.

“We have developed - through global consultations - a concrete and practical guidance for UN Member States to fulfill their obligations to respect, protect and promote this fundamental right,” Mr. Andenas added.  

This guiding document, which will be presented to the Human Rights Council in September this year, is intended to advise States and other relevant actors in establishing effective mechanisms to ensure judicial oversight over all situations of deprivation of liberty.

During its upcoming session, the Working Group will also discuss close to 30 confidential cases concerning 23 different countries. It further plans to meet with representatives from States and civil society organizations to assess various issues relating to deprivation of liberty.

Last year, the human rights experts adopted 57 opinions in respect of 30 different countries. In a number of cases, Governments and sources reported that the individuals were released and in other cases, the Working Group was assured that the detainees concerned would be guaranteed a fair trial.

(*) The Working Group is comprised of five independent expert members from various regions of the world. The Chair-Rapporteur is Mr. Mads Andenas (Norway) and the Vice-Chair is Mr. Vladimir Tochilovsky (Ukraine). The other members are Mr. Sètondji Roland Jean-Baptiste Adjovi (Benin), Mr. Seong-Phil Hong (Republic of Korea) and Mr. José Guevara (Mexico).

ENDS

The Working Group was established by the former Commission on Human Rights in 1991 to investigate instances of alleged arbitrary deprivation of liberty. Its mandate was clarified and extended by the Commission to cover the issue of administrative custody of asylum-seekers and immigrants. Learn more, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Detention/Pages/WGADIndex.aspx

The Working Group is part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.

The Basic Principles and Guidelines - Background information and relevant stakeholder contributions: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Detention/Pages/DraftBasicPrinciples.aspx

For more information and media requests, please contact Mr. Miguel de la Lama (+41 22 917 9289 / mdelalama@ohchr.org) or write to wgad@ohchr.org

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:
Twitter: http://twitter.com/UNrightswire

NEWS RELEASE - UN experts warn over Council of Europe mixed messages on homelessness in t



UN experts warn over Council of Europe mixed messages on homelessness in the Netherlands

GENEVA (16 April 2015) - The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe let politics trump respect for human rights when it issued two convoluted resolutions relating to the plight of homeless persons with irregular migration status in the Netherlands, according to three human rights experts*.  

“The Council appears to have sent mixed and ultimately incompatible messages in its response to the legal finding of the European Committee of Social Rights,” said Philip Alston, United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights.

“On the one hand, the Ministers effectively rejected the arguments put by the Dutch Government, which had called for the finding to be deemed erroneous. That means that the decision stands and the Dutch Government’s obligations to take urgent and immediate action have been upheld. That is very good news for those who might otherwise have been left in the future to survive without shelter through long and cold winters, as well as for Europe’s human rights principles,” said Alston.

“On the other hand, the Ministers employed deliberately weak language, seemingly accepting the Dutch Government’s claim that a large and singularly vulnerable category of people are excluded from its human rights obligations. They failed to use language consistently used in earlier comparable resolutions, and included a diluted obligation for the Government to report on the steps it is obligated to take to remedy the situation.”

According to the experts, it is particularly disturbing that the Ministers failed to refer to earlier resolutions that explicitly provide that Member States have a responsibility to prevent homelessness of persons with an irregular migration status. “States might erroneously interpret today’s resolution as allowing them to ignore the Charter rights of irregular migrants present in their jurisdiction,” the experts noted.

Last year, the European Committee of Social Rights, a body that oversees the European Social Charter, decided in two separate cases that the Netherlands is violating the right to emergency assistance of adult homeless irregular migrants. Decisions by the European Committee of Social Rights are followed by resolutions by the Committee of Ministers, a political body that cannot reverse the legal assessment by the expert body.
 
“The legal assessment by the European Committee that the Netherlands has an obligation under the European Social Charter to provide emergency assistance to homeless irregular migrants is not affected by today’s resolution. Moreover, the Netherlands is not only under a European, but also under an international obligation to ensure the rights of this group,” said the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, François Crépeau.

In December 2014, the three experts were in contact with the Dutch Government when it refused to implement the two decisions by the European Committee of Social Rights. In January 2015, the Dutch Government announced it would fund municipalities that are offering emergency assistance to homeless irregular migrants – a change of its long-standing position that was welcomed by the experts.

“I expect that the Dutch Government will now give full effect to the decisions by the European Committee to ensure that the situation in the country is brought into full conformity with the European Social Charter and international human rights law,” said the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing, Leilani Farha.

The resolution by the Committee of Ministers requests the Netherlands to report on further developments on this matter. The UN experts will continue to closely monitor developments in the Netherlands.

ENDS

(*) The experts: The Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, Philip Alston; the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context, Leilani Farha; and the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, François Crépeau.

Philip Alston (Australia) took office as UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights in June 2014, following his appointment by the Human Rights Council. He is John Norton Pomeroy Professor of Law at New York University School of Law. Mr. Alston has previously served the UN in several capacities including as Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, Special Adviser to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Millennium Development Goals, as well as chairperson of the UN Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. As Special Rapporteur, he is independent and acts in his personal capacity. Learn more, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Poverty/Pages/SRExtremePovertyIndex.

François Crépeau (Canada) was appointed Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants in 2011 by the UN Human Rights Council. As Special Rapporteur, he is independent from any government or organization and serves in his individual capacity. Mr. Crépeau is also Full Professor at the Faculty of Law of McGill University, in Montréal, where he holds the Hans and Tamar Oppenheimer Chair in Public International Law. Learn more, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Migration/SRMigrants/Pages/SRMigrantsIndex.aspx

Leilani Farha (Canada) is the UN Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context. She took her function in June 2014. Ms. Farha is the Executive Director of the NGO Canada Without Poverty, based in Ottawa, Canada. A lawyer by training, for the past 20 years Ms. Farha has worked both internationally and domestically on the implementation of the right to adequate housing for the most marginalized groups and on the situation of people living in poverty. Learn more, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Housing/Pages/HousingIndex.aspx
  
UN Human Rights, country page – The Netherlands: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Countries/ENACARegion/Pages/NLIndex.aspx

For more information and media requests, please contact Junko Tadaki (+ 41 22 917 9298) or write to
 
UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:

Storify:        http://storify.com/UNrightswire           

17. 04. 2015.

NEWS RELEASE - Human rights must always be protected, even when countering terroris



 Human rights must always be protected, even when countering terrorism – UN experts
  
GENEVA (16 April 2015) – Human rights and freedoms should not be sacrificed for political convenience in the fight against terrorism, two United Nations human rights experts have said today.

“It is only by strict adherence to international human rights standards that counter-terrorism strategies can ultimately succeed,” said Ben Emmerson, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism and Heiner Bielefeldt, Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief.  

“Just as much as we condemn terrorism, particularly at a time when the international community reaffirms its unreserved commitment to combat it, we must demand that human rights be respected in the context of such a challenge,” the experts said, directing their comments at Governments currently engaged in counter-terrorism campaigns.

The human rights experts described the recent attack at Garissa University College in Kenya, which killed at least 147 students and lecturers, as “a savage act of extreme brutality,” which “shows the urgent need to rethink counter-terrorism responses based only on law enforcement and military force.”

“Many observers of such violence tend to underestimate the complexity of these phenomena by using the label “religion” broadly and loosely while it is important to take also non-religious factors more seriously,”  said Mr Bielefeldt and Mr Emmerson.

“This is particularly true when confronting challenges such as armed conflict, poor governance, environmental degradation, endemic corruptions, intricate historic legacies of a country, extreme poverty, social, cultural, economic and political discrimination, as well as marginalisation of large sections of the population, or prolonged periods of State collapse,” the experts highlighted. “These circumstances provide fertile soil for recruitment to movements that promise a prospect for change, but resort to the unacceptable means of acts of terrorism to achieve their goals.”

The experts underlined that while there cannot be a single response to those questions, it is clear that a sustainable approach is needed in counter-terrorism that tackles not only the manifestations of terrorism but also its root causes.

UN Member States have unanimously recognised that the protection of human rights and freedoms is a prerequisite to any effective counter-terrorism strategy. Security Council resolution 1963 states that terrorism would not be defeated by military force, law enforcement measures, and intelligence operations alone.

“By actively promoting and protecting human rights, States contribute to preventing terrorism in an effort to address its root causes and risk factors,” the exerts said, noting that this is the spirit of the 2006 UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, which was recently reaffirmed in 2014. The strategy emphasises that any measure adopted by States to counter terrorism must comply with their obligations under international law, in particular international human rights, refugee and humanitarian law.

“This is not solely a question of legitimacy; it is also a question of effective prevention,” the independent experts stated. “Respect for the rule of law, and the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms are essential to offer a viable alternative to those who could otherwise be susceptible to terrorist recruitment and to radicalisation.”

The UN experts emphasised that any sound, sustainable, and comprehensive strategy to combat terrorism also requires recognition of the suffering of victims of terrorist acts. States should accept a special obligation to victims of terrorism that aims to provide adequate reparation to the victims of all acts of terrorism occurring on their territory, irrespective of whether public officials are found to have been at fault in some way.

“To require the victims to bear the burden of proving fault on the part of a public authority, when all of the evidence is in the hands of the State, and much of it will be classified, is unfair, unjustified and inhuman”, the experts noted.  

 “The suffering of victims should not be misused as a pretext to deny the human rights of those suspected of terrorism, to justify emergency measures including excessive and disproportionate executive powers, repression of legitimate peaceful opposition activities or for other restrictive political purposes,” they added.

“This adds to the vicious circle of terrorism by contributing to the dehumanization of victims of terrorism,” the expert noted. “Genuine respect for the humanity of the victims requires that the protection of human rights is not invoked to curtail human rights,” the independent experts said, recommending that States move towards the adoption of a specific international instrument setting out the rights of victims of terrorism and the corresponding obligations on States.

ENDS

The Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity. Learn more, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/SP/Pages/Welcomepage.aspx

Check the UN 2006 Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy: http://www.un.org/terrorism/strategy-counter-terrorism.shtml 

Read the report on preventing violence committed in the name of religion by the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief (A/HRC/28/66): http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session28/Pages/ListReports.aspx

For more information and media requests please contact Alessandro Marra (+41 22 928 9870 / amarra@ohchr.org) or write to srct@ohchr.org.

For media inquiries related to other UN independent experts:
Xabier Celaya, UN Human Rights – Media Unit (+ 41 22 917 9383 / xcelaya@ohchr.org)  

UN Human Rights, follow us on social media: