EP u zavadi s čelnicima EU oko Turske, delom i oko Rusije -EP at odds with EU leaders around Turkey, work in and around Russia

Objavljeno : 25.11.2016.             

  

Pretnja turskog predsednika Redžepa Erdogana da će ponovo preko granica pustiti stotine hiljada migranata u Evropu izazvala je veliku zabrinutost u Evropskoj komisiji i mnogim vladama Evropske unije, pa i sukob s poslanicima Evropskog parlamenta. Erdoganovo ljutito reagovanje posledica je zahteva Evropskog parlamenta da se zamrznu pregovori o članstvu s Turskom, iako su čelnici EU upozoravali da se politika prema Turskoj mora voditi krajnje pažljivo. Istovremeno je među evropskim poslanicima velike podele izazvala rezolucija EP o zauzdavanju antievropske propagande Rusije i ID.

Evropska komisija je 25. novembra stavila do znanja da se "prima na znanje" neobavezujuća rezolucija Evropskog parlamenta, što traži temeljitiju raspravu, i naglasila da je zasad Erdoganova pretnja "hipotetična", pa se otud sve mora usredsrediti na to da obe strane, a to čini EU, sprovode dosledno sporazum Brisel-Ankara o zaustavljanju migranata.

Kako navode diplomatski izvori u EU, koji su neskriveno pokazali veliko nezadovoljstvo zbog rezolucije EP, visoka evropska predstavnica Federika Mogerini i komesar za proširenje Johanes Han jasno su tražili od poslanika EU da uvaže potrebu "uravnoteženog pristupa" u odnosima s Turskom.

Činjenica je, kako su to rekli i neki šefovi diplomatija EU na poslednjem sastanku u Briselu, da, uz sve kritike Erdoganu zbog teških kršenja demokratskih sloboda, Ankara poštuje sporazum s Briselom i više nema nekontrolisane navale migranata preko Turske u Evropu.

Visoka predstavnica Mogerini u raspravi u Evropskom parlamentu poslanicima je predočila da bi prekid odnosa s Turskom doveo u pitanje i sporazum o zaustavljanju migranata i naglasila da bi to "bio potez u kojem svi gube".

Iako je to odraz mišljenja većine vlada EU, neke članice EU, poput Austrije i Luksemburga, kao i većina evropskih parlamentaraca, smatraju da masovna kršenja ljudskih prava i hapšenje desetina hiljada vojnika, policajaca, profesora, novinara u Turskoj najgrublje dovode u pitanje mogućnost da se s Ankarom nastave pregovori o članstvu.

Bivši švedski premijer Karl Bilt je ocenio da su poslanici EP zahtevom da se zalede pregovori s Turskom "posegli za kratkoročnim populističkim korakom, umesto strateškog pristupa na duži rok".

Mogerini je u raspravi u EP stavila do znanja da se prekidom pregovora gubi "životni važan kanal za dijalog" i podvukla da se mora postaviti pitanje kakva oruđa EU ima da poveća, a ne smanji, uticaj na sprovođenje reformi u Turskoj i na tursko društvo.

Rezolucija EP je neobavezujuća politička preporuka Savetu ministara EU i Evropskoj komisiji i treba sačekati šta će te institucije odlučiti, isto kao i kada je reč o rezoluciji o suprotstavljanju propagandi Rusije i Islamske države.

Iako se u štabu čelnice Evropske službe za spoljno delovanje (EEAS) Federike Mogerini priprema tim stručnjaka koji treba da stvore mehanizam i zadatke za raskrinkavanje, kako se smatra, ciljane propagande Rusije i Islamske države, sam sadržaj rezolucije EP je izazvao velike podele među evropskim poslanicima.

Oni su se, što se odavno nije dogodilo, u vidljivoj većini uzdržali ili glasali protiv rezolucije, tako da je ona usvojena manjinom glasova, uz podele unutar poslaničkih grupa, a što odražava i nejasnoće u političkim i vladajućim snagama u EU oko buduće politike prema Rusiji, naročito imajući u vidu nagoveštaj drugačije politike buduće američke administracije prema Moskvi.

Pored snaga u EP koje su tradicionalno protiv daljeg jačanja EU, jedino je grupa Ujedinjene levice i Nordijskih zelenih kao celina posebno predočila da je neprihvatljivo da se Rusija stavlja u istu ravan sa islamskom terorističkom organizacijom.

Rezoluciju je pripremila Ana Fotiga, poslanica vladajuće krajnje konzervativne poljske stranke Pravo i pravda, i u njoj se, što su otvoreno zamerili neki poslanici, ruski mediji, poput Sputnjika ili televizije Rasija danas ne samo žigošu kao "lažni i direktno finansirani od vlade", nego im se pripisuje i takva moć da mogu da razbiju demokratske vrednosti, ugroze suverenitet nekih država EU i izazovu rascep i rasulo u EU.

Tvorac izveštaja i predloga rezolucije Ana Fotiga je to odbacila i ocenila da se u "raspravi poslanika stalno ponavljaju poruke Kremlja".

Usvajanje rezolucije je naišlo na mnogo manju pažnju u medijima EU nego što se moglo očekivati i jedino su italijanski i nemački mediji preneli i reagovanje ruskog predsednika Vladimira Putina da je pretnja da će žigosani ruski mediji možda biti zabranjeni u Evropi "svedočanstvo političkog urušavanja demokratije u zapadnim zemljama".

Italijanski list Republika je ocenio da rezolucija i podele oko nje svedoče i o pripremama unutar vlada i snaga u EU za decembarsku temeljnu raspravu oko budućnosti odnosa s Rusijom i naročito sankcija prema Moskvi, čemu se protive neke vlade Unije.

Federika Mogerini je objasnila da će zadatak posebne grupe za "stratešku komunikaciju" biti da se da reč onima koji su imali koristi od politika EU, "stavi naglasak na pozitivne priče, uproste poruke i govori o istinskom životu".

Vođa grupe liberala u EP Gi Verhofstat je za mnogo oštriju politiku i, štaviše, kazao je da postoji neka vrsta međunarodne zavere protiv EU.

"Ono što ja danas vidim je da i Rusi i Amerikanci i Turci zajedno rade manje više na evropskom tlu da bi razorili evropski model društva", rekao je prvak liberala u Evropskom parlamentu.

Izvor: Dragan Blagojević, dopisnik agencije Beta

Foto: Beta

logo associations

                                                

Posted: 11.25.2016.

The threat of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Erdogan will again across borders to let hundreds of thousands of migrants in Europe has caused great concern in the European Commission and many governments of the European Union, as well as conflict with MEPs. Erdogan's angry reaction resulting in the European Parliament request to freeze membership talks with Turkey, even though EU leaders warned that the policy towards Turkey must take the utmost care. At the same time among the European deputies caused great divisions EP resolution on the curb anti-European propaganda Russia and ID.

The European Commission on 25 November made it clear that "takes note of" non-binding resolution of the European Parliament, which requires a more thorough discussion, and pointed out that so far Erdogan's threat to "hypothetical", and hence everything must focus on the fact that both sides, and it makes the EU implemented consistently Brussels-Ankara agreement on stopping migrants.

How according to diplomatic sources in the EU, which are openly expressed great dissatisfaction with the EP resolution, high European Representative Federica Mogherini and Enlargement Commissioner Johannes Hahn clearly sought from members of the EU to recognize the need for a "balanced approach" in relations with Turkey.

The fact is, as they say that some EU foreign ministers at the last meeting in Brussels that, with all the criticism Erdogan for serious violations of democratic freedoms, respect the Ankara agreement with Brussels and no longer uncontrollable rush of migrants through Turkey to Europe.

The High Representative Mogherini in the debate in the European Parliament deputies presented to the severance of relations with Turkey led to the agreement on stopping migrants and stressed that this "was a move in which everyone loses."

Although this is a reflection of the thinking of most governments EU, some EU countries, such as Austria and Luxembourg, as well as the majority of European parliamentarians, believe that massive human rights violations and arrest of tens of thousands of soldiers, police officers, teachers, journalists in Turkey crudest prejudice to the possibility that continue with Ankara's membership negotiations.

Former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt said that MEPs demand to freeze talks with Turkey "resorted to short-term populist step, rather than a strategic approach in the longer term."

Mogherini in the debate in the EP made it clear that the termination of negotiations, loses "life is an important channel for dialogue" and underlined that the question must be asked what tools the EU has to increase, not reduce, the impact of the reforms in Turkey and the Turkish society.

The EP resolution is non-binding policy recommendations to the Council of Ministers of the EU and the European Commission, and we should wait for what will decide this institution, as well as with regard to the resolution on countering the propaganda of Russia and Islamic countries.

Although the headquarters faceplate of the European External Action Service (EEAS) Federica Mogherini is preparing a team of professionals who need to create a mechanism for unmasking and tasks, said to be the target of propaganda of Russia and Islamic countries, the actual content of the EP resolution has caused great divisions among European MPs .

They were, what had happened a long time ago, in the most visible abstained or voted against the resolution, so she adopted the minority vote, with divisions within the parliamentary groups, which reflects the uncertainties in the political and governing forces in the EU on future policy towards Russia , particularly bearing in mind the hint of a different future policy of the American administration towards Moscow.

In addition to the power of the EP that are traditionally against the further strengthening of the EU, is the only group of United Left and Nordic Green as a whole presented a special that it is unacceptable that Russia put on an equal footing with the Islamic terrorist organization.

The resolution was prepared by Ana Fotyga, a member of the ruling party's most conservative Polish Law and Justice, and it is, as some MPs openly resented the Russian media, such as television or dispersed Sputnik not only today branded as "false and funded directly by the government," but they are credited with such power that can break the democratic values, threaten the sovereignty of some EU countries and cause a split and dissolution of the EU.

The creator of the report and draft resolution Ana Fotyga has rejected this and said that a "debate MPs keep repeating the message of the Kremlin."

Adoption of the resolution was met with much less attention in the media EU than might have been expected, and only the Italian and German media quoted the response of Russian President Vladimir Putin that the threat to branded Russian media may be prohibited in Europe "testimony to the political collapse of democracy in the Western countries. "

Italian Journal of the Republic said that the resolutions and share around her testify about the preparations within the government and the forces in the EU for the December fundamental debate about the future of relations with Russia, and especially sanctions against Moscow, a move opposed by some EU governments.

Federica Mogherini explained that the task of a special group of "strategic communication" would be the word to those who have benefited from EU policies, "puts the emphasis on the positive stories, simplify the message and talk about real life."

Liberal group leader in the EP Gi Verhofstat is much tougher policy and, moreover, said that there is some sort of international conspiracy against the EU.

"What I see today is that the Russians and the Americans and Turks are working together more or less on European soil to be destroyed by a European model of society," said the champion of liberals in the European Parliament.

Source: Dragan Blagojevic, a correspondent for the agencyBeta

Photo: Beta

Translated by

Nebojša Vladisavljević

 romi.novinari@yahoo.com