Objavljeno : 29.11.2016.
Učesnici skupa "U susret izmenama Ustava - ustavni
položaj pravosuđa", koji je 29. novembra u Beogradu okupio više od 200
domaćih i stranih stručnjaka, ocenili su da su ustavne izmene neophodne kako bi
se sistem pravosuđa unapredio i obezbedila njegova nezavisnost. Navedeno je da
treba promeniti odredbe koje se odnose na izbor sudija, javnih tužilaca,
članova Državnog veća tužilaca i Visokog saveta sudstva. Pomoćnik ministra
pravde rekao je na skupu da sudije najveći pritisak trpe od kolega, rođaka i
advokata a u 7% slučajeva pokušaj neprimerenog uticaja na sudije u donošenju
odluka vršili su predstavnici izvršne vlasti.
Predsednik Vrhovnog kasacionog suda Dragomir Milojević
izjavio je da je donošenje Ustava 2006. izazvalo niz kontroverzi i da se od
samog usvajanja tog najvišeg pravnog akta Srbije smatralo da su njegove izmene
neophodne kako bi se, između ostalog, obezbedila nezavisnost pravosuđa.
Najviši pravni akt Srbije izazvao je kontroverze i
primedbe ne samo među domaćim stručnjacima, već i Venecijanske komisije Saveta
Evrope.
Neke od odredbi u segmentu pravosuđa koje je potebno
izmeniti odnose se na izbor sudija, javnih tužilaca, njihovih zamenika, članova
Državnog veća tužilaca i Visokog saveta sudstva, rekao je Milivojević i dodao
da se smatra da će se napredak ka nezavisnosti sudstva obezbediti ako se te
stvari reše.
Prema njegovim rečima, izmene vezane za Visoki savet
sudstva i Državno veće tužilaca trebalo bi da idu ka isključenju predstavnika
zakonodavne i izvršne vlasti iz njihovog sastava.
Jedna od ideja, kako je dodao, jeste da se iz njihovog
članstva isključi i predstavnik advokature, a da na njegovo mesto bude biran
ugledni predstavnik pravne struke.
Milojević je rekao da izbor predsednika sudova ne treba
prepuštati Skupštini, već Visokom savetu sudstva, i dodao da bi trebalo ukinuti
prvi izbor sudija na tri godine jer taj vid njihovog "probnog rada" u
neku ruku predstavlja uticaj na sudstvo.
Šef Misije Organizacije za evropsku bezbednost i saradnju
(OEBS) u Srbiji, ambasador Andrea Oricio rekao je da je princip nezavisnosti
sudstva ključan za garantovanje fer suđenja i da je Misija tu da pomogne Srbiji
i pruži joj najbolje prakse 57 zemalja članica.
Prema njegovim rečima, izmene sprskog Ustava treba da
obuhvataju nacionalnu pravnu tradiciju i kulturu, ali i međunardne standarde.
"OEBS je tu da ponudi dodatu vrednost kako bi
reforme bile dobre i savremene", rekao je Oricio.
Jedan od glavnih ciljeva promena Ustava treba da bude da
se otkloni svaki mogući uticaj vlasti na pravosuđe, jer je nezavistnost sudstva
ključna garancija prava na pravičnost, naveo je on i dodao da sudije moraju
biti nezavisne i nepristrasne u zaštiti prava pojedinaca.
Konferencija "U susret izmenama Ustava - ustavni
položaj pravosuđa" prva je u nizu predstavnika Ministarstva pravde i
Vrhovnog kasacionog suda kako bi se došlo do najboljeg rešenja za jačanje
sudske nezavisnosti kroz izmene Ustava, dodao je Oricio.
Pritisci kolega, biznismena i rođaka na sudije
Pomoćnik ministra pravde Srbije Čedomir Backović izjavio
je da je analiza pokušaja neprimerenih uticaja na sudije u donošenju odluka
pokazala da su u 7% slučajeva pritisak vršili predstavnici izvršne vlasti, a u
93% situacija njihove kolege - sudije, advokati, rođaci i ostali.
Backović je dodao da su to podaci Funkcionalne analize
pravosuđa u Srbiji, Svetske banke, na osnovu razgovora sa sudijama.
Pomoćnik ministra je to rekao odgovarajući na pitanje da
li se može očekivati da se izmenama Ustava u cilju povećanja sudske
nezavisnosti u potpunosti otkloni uticaj izvršne i zakonodavne vlasti na
pravosuđe.
"U svakom slučaju, Ministarstvo pravde se zalaže za
nezavisno sudstvo kao jednu od garancija nepristrasnosti sudstva", naveo
je Backović.
U strateškim dokumentima o reformi pravosuđa predviđene
su aktivnosti koje isključuju mogućnosti neprimerenih uticaja na sudske odluke
različitih činilaca, ali ne i izvršne vlasti, dodao je on.
"Neophodno je isključiti mogućnost politizacije
odluka, a sa druge strane, kao balans tome, Ustavom i zakonom potrebno je
predvideti konkretnu sprovodljivu odgovornost za donošenje odluka, kako
pojedinih sudija, tako i sudstva u celini", rekao je Backović.
Izvor: Beta
Foto: Beta
logo Association
Posted:
11.29.2016.
Participants of the conference "Towards Amending the
Constitution - the constitutional position of the judiciary", which is
November 29 in Belgrade, gathered more than 200 domestic and foreign experts
have estimated that the constitutional changes necessary to improve the
judicial system and ensure its independence. It was stated that the need to
change the provisions relating to the appointment of judges, public
prosecutors, members of the State Council of Prosecutors and the High Judicial
Council. Assistant Minister of Justice said at the meeting that the judges
suffer the greatest pressure from colleagues, relatives and lawyers in an
attempt to 7% of undue influence on judges in decision-making was carried out
by representatives of the executive branch.
President of the Supreme Court of Cassation Dragomir
Milojevic said that the adoption of the Constitution of 2006 caused
considerable controversy, and since the adoption of the highest legal act of
Serbia thought that his changes are necessary in order to, among other things,
ensure the independence of the judiciary.
The highest legal act of Serbia has sparked controversy
and objections not only among domestic experts, but also the Venice Commission
of the Council of Europe.
Some of the provisions in the area of justice, has to
be amended to refer to the selection of judges, public prosecutors, their
deputies, members of the State Council of Prosecutors and the High Judicial
Council, said Milivojevic added that it is considered that the progress towards
the independence of the judiciary to ensure if these things settle.
According to him, the changes related to the High
Judicial Council and State Prosecutorial Council should move towards the
exclusion of representatives of legislative and executive authorities of their
composition.
One idea, he
added, is to exclude from their membership and a representative of the legal
profession, and that in its place is dialed prominent representative of the
legal profession.
Milojevic said that the choice of court presidents should
not be left to the Assembly, but the High Judicial Council, and added that it
should terminate the appointment of judges in the first three years, because
this aspect of their "probationary period" in some sense represents
the impact on the judiciary.
Head of the Mission of the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) to Serbia, Ambassador Andrea Oricio said that the
principle of judicial independence is crucial to guarantee a fair trial and
that the mission there to help Serbia and handed her a best practice 57 member
countries.
According to him, the changes sprskog Constitution should
include national legal tradition and culture, but also the international
standard. "The OSCE is here to offer added value to the reform were good
and modern," said Oricio.
One of the main objectives of amending the Constitution
should be to eliminate any possible government influence on the judiciary,
since-independence of the judiciary is a key guarantee of the right to justice,
he said, adding that judges must be independent and impartial in protecting the
rights of individuals.
The conference "Towards the amendments of the
Constitution - the constitutional position of the judiciary" is the first
in a series of representatives of the Ministry of Justice and the Supreme Court
of Cassation in order to reach the best solution for strengthening judicial
independence through constitutional changes, he added Oricio.
Pressures
colleagues, businessmen and relatives of the judges
Assistant Minister of Justice of Serbia Čedomir Backović
said that the analysis attempted undue influence on judges in decision-making
showed that 7% of the pressure exercised by representatives of the executive,
and in 93% of the situations of their colleagues - judges, lawyers, relatives
and others.
Backović added that this data Functional analysis of the
judiciary in Serbia, the World Bank, based on interviews with judges.
Deputy Minister said this in response to the question
whether it can be expected that amendments to the Constitution in order to
increase judicial independence completely eliminate the influence of the
executive and legislative powers to the judiciary.
"In any case, the Ministry of Justice is committed
to an independent judiciary as one of the guarantees of impartiality of the
judiciary," said Backović.
The strategic document on judicial reform provided for
the activities which exclude possibility of undue influence on judicial
decisions of various factors, but not the executive branch, he added.
"It is necessary to exclude the possibility of
politicization of decisions, and on the other hand, as a balance this, the
Constitution and the law is necessary to provide for an implementing specific
responsibility for making decisions on how individual judges and the judiciary
as a whole," said Backović.
Source: Beta
Photo by : Beta
Translated by
Nebojša Vladisavljević
Nema komentara:
Objavi komentar